ArticleScientific reports2020
Machine learning predicts live-birth occurrence before in-vitro fertilization treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNome analysis generates a blood-based signature for endometriosis.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- An Optimal Approach in Selecting Embryo for In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Based on Deep Learning.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- AI-enabled precision reproductive medicine: a comprehensive review of clinical applications, decision frameworks, and evidence-based implementation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics and multi-omics approaches in male infertility: implications for diagnosis and assisted reproduction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Treatment management algorithm for natural frozen embryo transfer cycles using a real-time ovulation prediction machine learning model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Study of comparative performance of general-purpose LLM-based systems in predicting IVF outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Machine learning prediction of live birth after IVF using the morphological uterus sonographic assessment group features of adenomyosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-modal Artificial Intelligence of Embryo Grading and Pregnancy Prediction in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Review
- Interpretable machine learning model for predicting MII oocyte retrieved following controlled ovarian stimulation: a retrospective cohort study of 24,976 IVF/ICSI cycles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Enhancing frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes and treatment personalization through machine learning models.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Predicting pregnancy outcomes in IVF cycles: a systematic review and diagnostic meta- analysis of artificial intelligence in embryo assessment.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Review
- Machine learning prediction of clinical pregnancy in endometriosis patients following fresh IVF/ICSI-ET.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches for image classification in developmental biology and clinical embryology.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- Machine learning in predicting infertility treatment success: A systematic literature review of techniques.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Introducing artificial intelligence and sperm epigenetics in the fertility clinic: a novel foundation for diagnostics and prediction modelling.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision Support Algorithms, Mathematical Models, Calculators Applications in Infertility: Systematic Review and Hands-On Digital Applications.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Improved clinical pregnancy rates in natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles with machine learning ovulation prediction: insights from a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Patient-Centric In Vitro Fertilization Prognostic Counseling Using Machine Learning for the Pragmatist.Seminars in reproductive medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is a popular method of resolving complications such as endometriosis, poor egg quality, a genetic disease of mother or father, problems with ovulation, antibody problems that harm sperm or eggs, the inability of sperm to penetrate or survive in the cervical mucus and low sperm counts, resulting human infertility. Nevertheless, IVF does not guarantee success in the fertilization. Choosing IVF is burdensome for the reason of high cost and uncertainty in the result. As the complications and fertilization factors are numerous in the IVF process, it is a cumbersome task for fertility doctors to give an accurate prediction of a successful birth. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been employed in this study for predicting the live-birth occurrence. This work mainly focuses on making predictions of live-birth occurrence when an embryo forms from a couple and not a donor. Here, we compare various AI algorithms, including both classical Machine Learning, deep learning architecture, and an ensemble of algorithms on the publicly available dataset provided by Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Insights on data and metrics such as confusion matrices, F1-score, precision, recall, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are demonstrated in the subsequent sections. The training process has two settings Without feature selection and With feature selection to train classifier models. Machine Learning, Deep learning, ensemble models classification paradigms have been trained in both settings. The Random Forest model achieves the highest F1-score of 76.49% in without feature selection setting. For the same model, the precision, recall, and area under the ROC Curve (ROC AUC) scores are 77%, 76%, and 84.60%, respectively. The success of the pregnancy depends on both male and female traits and living conditions. This study predicts a successful pregnancy through the clinically relevant parameters in In-vitro fertilization. Thus artificial intelligence plays a promising role in decision making process to support the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.