Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33262328›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Deep learning suggests that gene expression is encoded in all parts of a co-evolving interacting gene regulatory structure.

Jan Zrimec, Christoph S Börlin, Filip Buric, Azam Sheikh Muhammad, Rhongzen Chen, Verena Siewers, Vilhelm Verendel, Jens Nielsen, Mats Töpel, Aleksej Zelezniak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In silico prediction of variant effects: promises and limitations for precision plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan ZrimecDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7099-961X
Christoph S BörlinDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Filip BuricDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-9040
Azam Sheikh MuhammadComputer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6037-7019
Rhongzen ChenComputer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Verena SiewersDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9502-9804
Vilhelm VerendelComputer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jens NielsenDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9955-6003
Mats TöpelDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7989-696X
Aleksej ZelezniakDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden. aleksej.zelezniak@chalmers.se.ORCID 0000-0002-3098-9441
Chalmers University of Technology · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the genetic regulatory code governing gene expression is an important challenge in molecular biology. However, how individual coding and non-coding regions of the gene regulatory structure interact and contribute to mRNA expression levels remains unclear. Here we apply deep learning on over 20,000 mRNA datasets to examine the genetic regulatory code controlling mRNA abundance in 7 model organisms ranging from bacteria to Human. In all organisms, we can predict mRNA abundance directly from DNA sequence, with up to 82% of the variation of transcript levels encoded in the gene regulatory structure. By searching for DNA regulatory motifs across the gene regulatory structure, we discover that motif interactions could explain the whole dynamic range of mRNA levels. Co-evolution across coding and non-coding regions suggests that it is not single motifs or regions, but the entire gene regulatory structure and specific combination of regulatory elements that define gene expression levels.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEvolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsBacteriaBase SequenceDrosophila melanogasterHumansMiceRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID33262328
PMCPMC7708451
OpenAlexW3108101741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.