Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33262186›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2020

Exploring the potential for introducing home monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy into maternity care: current views and experiences of staff-a qualitative study.

Lisa Hinton, James Hodgkinson, Katherine L Tucker, Linda Rozmovits, Lucy Chappell, Sheila Greenfield, Christine McCourt, Jane Sandall, Richard J McManus

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03334149 (Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03334149 nacompletednot on this map

Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2017 to 2020Enrolled3,042ConditionsPregnancy, High Risk, Pre-Eclampsia, Hypertension, Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedArmsSelf-Monitoring of Blood Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa HintonTHIS Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK lisa.hinton@thisinstitute.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-3151
James HodgkinsonPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7583-5278
Katherine L TuckerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6544-8066
Linda RozmovitsFreelance Researcher, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Lucy ChappellWomen's Health Academic Centre, King's College, London, UK.
Sheila GreenfieldPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Christine McCourtDepartment of Midwifery and Child Health, City University of London, London, UK.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Kings College, London, UK.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-028X
King's College London · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBCity, University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Department of Health RP-2014-05-019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOne in 20 women are affected by pre-eclampsia, a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity, death and premature birth worldwide. Diagnosis is made from monitoring blood pressure (BP) and urine and symptoms at antenatal visits after 20 weeks of pregnancy. There are no randomised data from contemporary trials to guide the efficacy of self-monitoring of BP (SMBP) in pregnancy. We explored the perspectives of maternity staff to understand the context and health system challenges to introducing and implementing SMBP in maternity care, ahead of undertaking a trial.

designExploratory study using a qualitative approach.

settingEight hospitals, English National Health Service.

participantsObstetricians, community and hospital midwives, pharmacists, trainee doctors (n=147).

methodsSemi-structured interviews with site research team members and clinicians, interviews and focus group discussions. Rapid content and thematic analysis undertaken.

resultsThe main themes to emerge around SMBP include (1) different BP changes in pregnancy, (2) reliability and accuracy of BP monitoring, (3) anticipated impact of SMBP on women, (4) anticipated impact of SMBP on the antenatal care system, (5) caution, uncertainty and evidence, (6) concerns over action/inaction and patient safety.

conclusionsThe potential impact of SMBP on maternity services is profound although nuanced. While introducing SMBP does not reduce the responsibility clinicians have for women's health, it may enhance the responsibilities and agency of pregnant women, and introduces a new set of relationships into maternity care. This is a new space for reconfiguration of roles, mutual expectations and the relationships between and responsibilities of healthcare providers and women. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03334149.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesObstetricsBlood PressureFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsState Medicinehypertensionmaternal medicineorganisation of health servicesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33262186
PMCPMC7709507
OpenAlexW3090472841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.