ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2021
Patient prioritisation for hospital pharmacy services: current approaches in the UK.
Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07282379 (DETECTION OF ISAR-FLAGGED AT-RISK MEDICATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Detection of isar-flagged at-risk medication in the emergency department (disarmed)
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring hospital pharmacist perspectives on ethical considerations from automated patient prioritisation: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- An Evaluation of Clinician and Informatician Perspectives on Medication Harm Risk Prediction Tools for Use in a Tertiary Hospital Setting.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Prediction tools to prioritise hospitalised adult patients at risk of drug related problems: An umbrella review.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of pharmacy clinical service redesign on quantity and quality of pharmacy interventions in a tertiary teaching hospital: a pre-post cohort study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Observational
- Hospital Pharmacists' Perspectives on Documenting and Classifying Pharmaceutical Interventions: A Nationwide Validation Study in Portugal.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Developing the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams-a modified Delphi study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a clinical score to identify hospitalised patients at high risk of drug-related problems.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Practising prioritisation: exploring variation in applying a clinical pharmacy risk stratification tool.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2024Article
- Enhancing the clinical pharmacy service of a large teaching hospital: Development of a new clinical prioritisation tool.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Prioritizing patients for medication review by emergency department pharmacists: a multi-method study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Development, implementation and evaluation of a seven-day clinical pharmacy service in a tertiary referral teaching hospital during surge-2 of the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Observational
- Analysis of the nature and contributory factors of medication safety incidents following hospital discharge using National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from England and Wales: a multi-method study.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2023Article
- A pilot study to identify elderly patients with cognitive impairment for clinical pharmacist polypharmacy review in General Practice.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo survey and explore current approaches to deployment of pharmaceutical care prioritisation tools in acute hospitals in the UK.
methodsA national online survey was circulated electronically to chief pharmacists of hospitals to determine if they use a prioritisation tool or process. Where such mechanisms exist, respondents were invited to participate in a semistructured telephone interview to explore the development, evaluation and application of their tool and share relevant documentation. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed.
resultsSeventy hospitals (70/130) used a tool or process to prioritise clinical pharmacy services. Thirty-six interviews were conducted, and two were excluded. The majority of tools had been developed in-house. Few hospitals had undertaken formal evaluations of their prioritisation tool. Pharmacy prioritisation tools ranged in complexity and often included a combination of pharmacy service prioritisation, such as medicines reconciliation, and a section to assign an individual patient prioritisation level. Determining the priority of a patient based on the identification of set indicators instilled confidence in pharmacists by ensuring they were not missing high-risk patients. Electronic prioritisation tools were especially useful at retrieving real-time data to prioritise workload, improving workflow and ensuring continuity in patient care. Drawbacks of using prioritisation tools included lack of tool sensitivity across certain specialties and time spent using the tool if not all information was accessible.
conclusionsPrioritisation tools were seen to be useful for prioritising workload and ensuring the right patients are seen at the right time. As few hospitals had formally evaluated their tools, it is important to rigorously and systematically develop an evidence-based prioritisation tool that is both useable and acceptable. Further research to evaluate such tools would be needed to ensure it improves patient health outcomes and efficiency in pharmacy services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.