ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
Articaine as an alternative in lidocaine allergy: Case report of a seventy year old male patient.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAllergy to lidocaine is extremely rare but if it occurs, one should switch to an alternative drug and discontinue the use of lidocaine so that adverse consequences do not occur. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of a 70 year old male patient who had come to our department to undergo extraction of his decayed teeth under local anesthesia. DISCUSSION: He had history of allergy to lidocaine. Type IV hypersensitivity to lidocaine was confirmed by positive skin prick testing to the drug. Skin prick testing was also performed for articaine that was available with us, and the test was found to be negative without any wheal or flare reaction even after 72 h. Thus it was confirmed that he was non-allergic to articaine and successfully underwent exodontia by using the same.
conclusionArticaine can be a suitable alternative in patients with true lignocaine allergy and vice-versa. No cross-reactivity has been reported between lidocaine and articaine so far. However, the number of cases reported in the past are limited, hence more cases are required in the future to prove its authenticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.