Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33261902›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2020

The Muslim Ban and preterm birth: Analysis of U.S. vital statistics data from 2009 to 2018.

Goleen Samari, Ralph Catalano, Héctor E Alcalá, Alison Gemmill

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of marriage and the family · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Aging, Race, and Health Disparities: Recommendations From the Research Centers Collaborative Network.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Goleen SamariDepartment of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, USA. Electronic address: gs3038@columbia.edu.
Ralph CatalanoSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Héctor E AlcaláProgram in Public Health, Department of Family, Population & Prevention Medicine, Stony Brook University, USA.
Alison GemmillDepartment of Family, Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.
Columbia University · USJohns Hopkins University · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Development CoreP2CHD058486 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI MATTHEW J NEIDELL · 2014 to 2026
$4.3M
Migration, Dynamic Social Environments, and Birth OutcomesK01HD103879 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SAMARI, GOLEEN · 2021 to 2025
$669k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD103879NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-immigrant stigma or xenophobia is increasingly pervasive globally. Racism is a determinant of adverse health outcomes, but the epidemiological implications of the recent wave of xenophobic policies have not been well studied. The 2017 travel ban on individuals from Muslim majority countries is an example of such policy efforts in the United States. Using the 2009-2018 National Center for Health Statistics period linked infant birth-death data, we used time series methods to compare the monthly odds of preterm births to women from travel ban countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen) after the January 2017 travel ban to the number expected had the ban not been implemented. We estimated our counterfactual from the history of preterm birth among women born in countries included in the ban as well as trends in preterm birth among native-born non-Hispanic (NH) White women. Among the 18,945,795 singleton live births included in our study period (including 191,121 born to women from banned countries), the average monthly rate of births that were preterm birth was 8.5% (range: 6.8%, 10.6%) among women born in the countries affected by the ban and 8.6% (range: 7.7%, 9.8%) among native-born NH White women. Our results show an increase in the odds of preterm birth among infants born to women from travel ban countries in September 2017 and persisting through the cohort born in August 2018. The coefficient for exposed infants born in these months suggests that the odds of preterm birth increased by 6.8% among women from banned countries (p < 0.001). Our results suggest that the first U.S. Executive Order (#13769) of the travel ban targeting individuals from Muslim majority countries may be associated with preterm births. We therefore conclude that structurally xenophobic and racist policies in the U.S. may have a harmful effect on birth outcomes and early life indicators of life-long health outcomes.

Indexed as

Premature BirthVital StatisticsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIranIraqIslamPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPregnancy, MultiplePregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedBirth weightImmigrantsInfant healthPrenatal stressStructural stigmaTime series models

Identifiers

PMID33261902
PMCPMC7738384
OpenAlexW3106890984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.