Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33261592›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2020

Digital three-dimensional visualization of intrabony periodontal defects for regenerative surgical treatment planning.

Daniel Palkovics, Francesco Guido Mangano, Katalin Nagy, Peter Windisch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel PalkovicsDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, 1088 Szentkirályi Str. 47. 4th Floor, Budapest, Hungary. palkovics.daniel@dent.semmelweis-univ.hu.ORCID 0000-0001-6398-1836
Francesco Guido ManganoDepartment of Prevention and Communal Dentistry, Sechenov First State Medical University, Bol'shaya Pirogovskaya Ulitsa, 19c1, Moscow, Russia.
Katalin NagyDepartment of Oral Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza L. Str. 64, Szeged, Hungary.
Peter WindischDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, 1088 Szentkirályi Str. 47. 4th Floor, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUSechenov University · RUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the regenerative treatment of intrabony periodontal defects, surgical strategies are primarily determined by defect morphologies. In certain cases, however, direct clinical measurements and intraoral radiographs do not provide sufficient information on defect morphologies. Therefore, the application of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been proposed in specific cases. 3D virtual models reconstructed with automatic thresholding algorithms have already been used for diagnostic purposes. The aim of this study was to utilize 3D virtual models, generated with a semi-automatic segmentation method, for the treatment planning of minimally invasive periodontal surgeries and to evaluate the accuracy of the virtual models, by comparing digital measurements to direct intrasurgical measurements.

methodsFour patients with a total of six intrabony periodontal defects were enrolled in the present study. Two months following initial periodontal treatment, a CBCT scan was taken. The novel semi-automatic segmentation method was performed in an open-source medical image processing software (3D Slicer) to acquire virtual 3D models of alveolar and dental structures. Intrasurgical and digital measurements were taken, and results were compared to validate the accuracy of the digital models. Defect characteristics were determined prior to surgery with conventional diagnostic methods and 3D virtual models. Diagnostic assessments were compared to the actual defect morphology during surgery.

resultsDifferences between intrasurgical and digital measurements in depth and width of intrabony components of periodontal defects averaged 0.31 ± 0.21 mm and 0.41 ± 0.44 mm, respectively. In five out of six cases, defect characteristics could not be assessed precisely with direct clinical measurements and intraoral radiographs. 3D models generated with the presented semi-automatic segmentation method depicted the defect characteristics correctly in all six cases.

conclusionIt can be concluded that 3D virtual models acquired with the described semi-automatic segmentation method provide accurate information on intrabony periodontal defect morphologies, thus influencing the treatment strategy. Within the limitations of this study, models were found to be accurate; however, further investigation with a standardized validation process on a large number of participants has to be conducted.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossPeriodontal DiseasesCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalRadiography3D radiographic image reconstructionCBCTPeriodontal diagnosticsRegenerative periodontal surgerySegmentationThree-dimensional treatment planning

Identifiers

PMID33261592
PMCPMC7709443
OpenAlexW3109299333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.