Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33261392›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2020

Pitch perception at very high frequencies: On psychometric functions and integration of frequency information.

Hedwig E Gockel, Brian C J Moore, Robert P Carlyon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sensitivity to Frequency Modulation is Limited Centrally.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On musical interval perception for complex tones at very high frequencies.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hedwig E GockelCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.ORCID s0000000306092068
Brian C J MooreCambridge Hearing Group, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID s0000000170710671
Robert P CarlyonCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council G8717539Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3Medical Research Council SUAG/042/G101400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lau et al. [J. Neurosci. 37, 9013-9021 (2017)] showed that discrimination of the fundamental frequency (F0) of complex tones with components in a high-frequency region was better than predicted from the optimal combination of information from the individual harmonics. The predictions depend on the assumption that psychometric functions for frequency discrimination have a slope of 1 at high frequencies. This was tested by measuring psychometric functions for F0 discrimination and frequency discrimination. Difference limens for F0 (F0DLs) and difference limens for frequency for each frequency component were also measured. Complex tones contained harmonics 6-10 and had F0s of 280 or 1400 Hz. Thresholds were measured using 210-ms tones presented diotically in diotic threshold-equalizing noise (TEN), and 1000-ms tones presented diotically in dichotic TEN. The slopes of the psychometric functions were close to 1 for all frequencies and F0s. The ratio of predicted to observed F0DLs was around 1 or smaller for both F0s, i.e., not super-optimal, and was significantly smaller for the low than for the high F0. The results are consistent with the idea that place information alone can convey pitch, but pitch is more salient when phase-locking information is available.

Indexed as

Pitch DiscriminationPitch PerceptionDifferential ThresholdNoisePsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID33261392
PMCPMC7613188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.