Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33260900›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Level and Determinants of Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures in the First Stage of the Outbreak in Uganda.

Bob O Amodan, Lilian Bulage, Elizabeth Katana, Alex R Ario, Joseph N Siewe Fodjo, Robert Colebunders, Rhoda K Wanyenze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. COVID-19 in Low and Middle Income Countries.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bob O AmodanUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala 7272, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-1337
Lilian BulageUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala 7272, Uganda.
Elizabeth KatanaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala 7272, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-5415-5778
Alex R ArioUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala 7272, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-3560-1952
Joseph N Siewe FodjoGlobal Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-1239
Robert ColebundersGlobal Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1919-1340
Rhoda K WanyenzeSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Mulago Kampala 7072, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted an online survey in the first two months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in Uganda to assess the level and determinants of adherence to and satisfaction with the COVID-19 preventive measures recommended by the government. We generated Likert scales for adherence and satisfaction outcome variables and measured them with four preventive measures, including handwashing, wearing face masks, physical distancing, and coughing/sneezing hygiene. Of 1726 respondents (mean age: 36 years; range: 12-72), 59% were males, 495 (29%) were adherent to, and 545 (32%) were extremely satisfied with all four preventive measures. Adherence to all four measures was associated with living in Kampala City Centre (AOR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.6) and receiving COVID-19 information from health workers (AOR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.01-1.5) or village leaders (AOR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.02-1.9). Persons who lived with younger siblings had reduced odds of adherence to all four measures (AOR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.93). Extreme satisfaction with all four measures was associated with being female (AOR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6) and health worker (AOR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.5). Experiencing violence at home (AOR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.67) was associated with lower satisfaction. Following reported poor adherence and satisfaction with preventive measures, behavior change programs using health workers should be expanded throughout, with emphasis on men.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient ComplianceSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaadherenceCOVID-19preventive measuressatisfactionUganda

Identifiers

PMID33260900
PMCPMC7734576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.