Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33260831›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Managing Big Data for Addressing Research Questions in a Collaborative Project on Automated Driving Impact Assessment.

Francesco Bellotti, Nisrine Osman, Eduardo H Arnold, Sajjad Mozaffari, Satu Innamaa, Tyron Louw, Guilhermina Torrao, Hendrik Weber, Johannes Hiller, Alessandro De Gloria and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesco BellottiDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4109-4675
Nisrine OsmanDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4953-1593
Eduardo H ArnoldWarwick Manufacturing Group (WMG), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7896-7252
Sajjad MozaffariWarwick Manufacturing Group (WMG), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8109-6953
Satu InnamaaVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT Espoo, Finland.
Tyron LouwInstitute for Transport Studies, University Road, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6577-6369
Guilhermina TorraoVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT Espoo, Finland.
Hendrik WeberInstitute for Automotive Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Steinbachstr 7, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Johannes HillerInstitute for Automotive Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Steinbachstr 7, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1835-6067
Alessandro De GloriaDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy.
Mehrdad DianatiWarwick Manufacturing Group (WMG), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Riccardo BertaDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1937-3969

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 723051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While extracting meaningful information from big data is getting relevance, literature lacks information on how to handle sensitive data by different project partners in order to collectively answer research questions (RQs), especially on impact assessment of new automated driving technologies. This paper presents the application of an established reference piloting methodology and the consequent development of a coherent, robust workflow. Key challenges include ensuring methodological soundness and data validity while protecting partners' intellectual property. The authors draw on their experiences in a 34-partner project aimed at assessing the impact of advanced automated driving functions, across 10 European countries. In the first step of the workflow, we captured the quantitative requirements of each RQ in terms of the relevant data needed from the tests. Most of the data come from vehicular sensors, but subjective data from questionnaires are processed as well. Next, we set up a data management process involving several partners (vehicle manufacturers, research institutions, suppliers and developers), with different perspectives and requirements. Finally, we deployed the system so that it is fully integrated within the project big data toolchain and usable by all the partners. Based on our experience, we highlight the importance of the reference methodology to theoretically inform and coherently manage all the steps of the project and the need for effective and efficient tools, in order to support the everyday work of all the involved research teams, from vehicle manufacturers to data analysts.

Indexed as

collaborative project methodologyconnected and automated drivingdeployment and field testingimpact assessmentknowledge managementresearch data collection and sharingvehicular sensors

Identifiers

PMID33260831
PMCPMC7730337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.