ArticlePolymers2020
Investigation on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Isotactic Polypropylene Parts Fabricated by Different Process Conditions with Different Aging Periods.
Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Study of Injection Molding Replicability for the Micro Embossment of the Ultrasonic Vibrator.Polymers · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polymeric parts have been increasingly used in various engineering fields. The performance of polymeric parts is significantly affected by working-environment-induced aging. In this paper, an ultrasonic-vibration-assisted injection molding system was designed and utilized to fabricate polymeric parts from isotactic polypropylene (iPP) using different processing conditions. The natural aging experiments were performed to age the fabricated iPP parts for one year. The effects of key process parameters as well as ultrasound power on the microstructures and the mechanical properties of the iPP parts after aging were systematically investigated using X-ray diffraction analysis, Fourier transform infrared analysis, scanning electron microscope imaging, and tensile testing. It is found that both the microstructures and the tensile strength of the iPP parts deteriorate with the increasing aging time. In addition, the crystallinity and the tensile strength decrease with the increasing melt temperature but increase with the increasing mold temperature in a given range and holding pressure. The increase in ultrasound power leads to an increase in crystallinity. However, when the ultrasound power is over 200 W, the tensile strength of the aged iPP parts decreases, which indicates that high ultrasound power may not form optimal condensed microstructures with excellent anti-aging capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.