Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33260553›Full record

ReviewTropical medicine and infectious disease2020

Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Saad Alhumaid, Abbas Al Mutair, Zainab Al Alawi, Naif Alhmeed, Abdul Rehman Zia Zaidi, Mansour Tobaiqy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Profiling of sesquiterpenoid fractions fromBiomolecules & biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Drugs for COVID-19 Treatment: A New Challenge.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. iScience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: an opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  16. COVID-19: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  17. Novel Drug Design for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Saad AlhumaidAdministration of Pharmaceutical Care, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4552-4513
Abbas Al MutairResearch Center, Almoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab Al AlawiDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Naif AlhmeedAdministration of Supply and Shared Services, Ministry of Health, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia.
Abdul Rehman Zia ZaidiResearch Center, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-9633
Mansour TobaiqyDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4292-0900
Ministry of Health · SAKing Faisal University · SASaad Specialist Hospital · SASulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges · SAUniversity of Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(Background) Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/RTV) is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiviral combination that has been considered for the treatment of COVID-19 disease. (Aim) This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LPV/RTV in COVID-19 patients in the published research. (Methods) A protocol was developed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Articles were selected for review from 8 electronic databases. This review evaluated the effects of LPV/RTV alone or in combination with standard care ± interferons/antiviral treatments compared to other therapies, regarding duration of hospital stay, risk of progressing to invasive mechanical, time to virological cure and body temperature normalization, cough relief, radiological progression, mortality and safety. (Results) A consensus was reached to select 32 articles for full-text screening; only 14 articles comprising 9036 patients were included in this study; and eight of these were included for meta-analysis. Most of these studies did not report positive clinical outcomes with LPV/RTV treatment. In terms of virological cure, three studies reported less time in days to achieve a virological cure for LPV/RTV arm relative to no antiviral treatment (-0.81 day; 95% confidence interval (CI), -4.44 to 2.81;

Indexed as

COVID-19efficacykaletralopinavir/ritonavirmeta-analysissafety

Identifiers

PMID33260553
PMCPMC7768433
OpenAlexW3106785693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.