ArticlePolymers2020
Effects of Processing Variables of Extrusion-Pultrusion Method on the Impregnation Quality of Thermoplastic Composite Filaments.
Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Forming Processes of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: From Material Challenges to Interface Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Innovative Injection Molding Process for the Fabrication of Woven Fabric Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites.Polymers · 2022Article
- Article
- Thermoplastic Pultrusion: A Review.Polymers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Carbon fibre-reinforced polypropylene composite filaments were fabricated via the extrusion-pultrusion method. One of the important factors influencing composites' filament processability and structural properties is the impregnation quality, which can be represented by interfacial adhesion between the matrix and fibre. To improve the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of the filament, four processing variables-melt temperature, pulling speed, number of pins in the impregnation die and fibre treatment-have been optimised using the Box-Behnken response surface methodology (RSM). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate the linearity of the response surface models. Three levels were set for each independent variable. The melt temperature was varied at levels 190, 210 and 230 °C, while the pulling speed was set at three levels, namely, 40, 47 and 50 cm/min. The number of spreader pins was varied at 1, 2 and 3 pins, and there were three variations of the fibre treatment, namely, vinyltrimethoxysilane (VTMS), γ-aminopropyltriethoxy silane (APTS) and liquid nitrogen. Twenty-seven experimental runs were conducted, and a significant regression for the coefficient between the variables was obtained. The filament IFSS was measured by a customised pull-out test, and its surface morphology was characterised using a scanning electron microscope. ANOVA showed that fibre treatment significantly affected the IFSS due to their surface roughness, followed by pulling speed and melt temperature in quadratic order. Liquid nitrogen is recommended for carbon fibre treatment because of the high surface roughness, thereby providing a better matrix-fibre bonding effect. The results demonstrated that a melt temperature of 190 °C, pulling speed of 40 cm/min, three spreader pins and treatment of the fibre with liquid nitrogen afforded the optimum impregnation quality. It is important to keep a reasonable low processing temperature to obtain the geometrical stability of the product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.