Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33260457›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Rapid Telehealth Implementation during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: A Rapid Review.

Cristian Lieneck, Joseph Garvey, Courtney Collins, Danielle Graham, Corein Loving, Raven Pearson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Telehealth Implementation Response to COVID-19 in the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Network: Perspectives of Clinicians and Health Systems Leaders.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristian LieneckSchool of Health Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-1096
Joseph GarveySchool of Health Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.
Courtney CollinsSchool of Health Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.
Danielle GrahamSchool of Health Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.
Corein LovingSchool of Health Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.
Raven PearsonSchool of Health Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation and continued expansion of telehealth services assists a variety of health care organizations in the delivery of care during the current COVID-19 global pandemic. However, limited research has been conducted on recent, rapid telehealth implementation and expansion initiatives regarding facilitators and barriers surrounding the provision of quality patient care. Our rapid review evaluated the literature specific to rapid telehealth implementation during the current COVID-19 pandemic from three research databases between January 2020 and May 2020 and reported using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The results indicate the rapid implementation and enhanced use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States surrounding the facilitators and barriers to the provision of patient care, which are categorized into three identified themes: (1) descriptive process-oriented implementations, (2) the interpretation and infusion of the CARES Act of 2020 telehealth exemptions related to the relaxation of patient privacy and security (HIPAA) protocols, and (3) the standard of care protocols and experiences addressing organizational liability and the standard of care. While the study limitation of sample size exists (

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19implementationtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33260457
PMCPMC7712147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.