Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33260427›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Mindfulness, Interoception, and Olfaction: A Network Approach.

Barbara Lefranc, Charles Martin-Krumm, Charlotte Aufauvre-Poupon, Benoit Berthail, Marion Trousselard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara LefrancAPEMAC/EPSAM, EA 4360, Ile du Saulcy, BP 30309, CEDEX 1, 57006 Metz, France.
Charles Martin-KrummAPEMAC/EPSAM, EA 4360, Ile du Saulcy, BP 30309, CEDEX 1, 57006 Metz, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6665-5566
Charlotte Aufauvre-PouponÉcole Camondo, 266 Boulevard Raspail, 75014 Paris, France.
Benoit BerthailFrench Military Health Service Academy, 1 Place Alphonse Laveran, CEDEX 05, 75230 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4399-0473
Marion TrousselardAPEMAC/EPSAM, EA 4360, Ile du Saulcy, BP 30309, CEDEX 1, 57006 Metz, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0592-4547

Funding

Direction Générale de l'Armement 15 000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fine-tuned interplay between the brain and the body underlies the adaptive ability to respond appropriately in the changing environment. Mindfulness Disposition (MD) has been associated with efficient emotional functioning because of a better ability to feel engaged by information from the body and to notice subtle changes. This interoceptive ability is considered to shape the ability to respond to external stimuli, especially olfaction. However, few studies have evaluated the relationships between interoception and exteroception according to MD. We conducted an exploratory study among 76 healthy subjects for first investigating whether MD is associated with better exteroception and second for describing the causal interactions network between mindfulness, interoception, emotion, and subjective and objective olfaction assessments. Results found that a high level of MD defined by clustering exhibited best scores in positive emotions, interoception, and extra sensors' acuity. The causal network approach showed that the interactions between the interoception subscales differed according to the MD profiles. Moreover, interoception awareness is strongly connected with both the MD and the hedonic value of odors. Then, differences according to MD might provide arguments for a more mindful attention style toward interoceptive cues in relation to available exteroceptive information. This interaction might underlie positive health.

Indexed as

causal networkclusteringinteroceptionmindfulnessolfaction

Identifiers

PMID33260427
PMCPMC7760383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.