ReviewPolymers2020
Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published on Antibacterial Dental Adhesive from 1996-2020.
Review in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Articles on the Methods of Shade-Matching in Dentistry.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Review
- Novel bioactive nanospheres show effective antibacterial effect against multiple endodontic pathogens.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Analyses of Experimental Dental Adhesives Based on Zirconia/Silver Phosphate Nanoparticles.Polymers · 2023Article
- Mapping out the scientific literature on extraction and socket preservation: A Scopus based analysis (1968-2020).The Saudi dental journal · 2022Review
- Review
- Research productivity in the genetics of papillary thyroid carcinoma (1991-2020): a bibliometric analysis.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Article
- Current Scientific Research Trends on Salivary Biomarkers: A Bibliometric Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Current Status and Trends in Research on Caries Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Virtual Laboratories- A historical review and bibliometric analysis of the past three decades.Education and information technologies · 2022Article
- Effect of Ultrasonic Vibration on Structural and Physical Properties of Resin-Based Dental Composites.Polymers · 2021Article
- Medical negligence in healthcare organizations and its impact on patient safety and public health: a bibliometric study.F1000Research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the current state of research on antibacterial dental adhesives. The interest in this field can be drawn from an increasing number of scholarly works in this area. However, there is still a lack of quantitative measurement of this topic. The main aim of this study was to consolidate the research published on the antibacterial adhesive from 1996 to 2020 in Web of Science indexed journals. The bibliometric method, a quantitative study of investigating publishing trends and patterns, was used for this study. The result has shown that a gradual increase in research was found, whereby a substantial increase was observed from 2013. A total of 248 documents were published in 84 journals with total citations of 5107. The highly cited articles were published mainly in Q1 category journals. Most of the published articles were from the USA, China, and other developed countries; however, some developing countries contributed as well. The authorship pattern showed an interdisciplinary and collaborative approach among researchers. The thematic evaluation of keywords along with a three-factor analysis showed that 'antibacterial adhesives' and 'quaternary ammonium' have been used commonly. This bibliometric analysis can provide direction not only to researchers but also to funding organizations and policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.