Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33260201›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Towards clinical data-driven eligibility criteria optimization for interventional COVID-19 clinical trials.

Jae Hyun Kim, Casey N Ta, Cong Liu, Cynthia Sung, Alex M Butler, Latoya A Stewart, Lyudmila Ena, James R Rogers, Junghwan Lee, Anna Ostropolets and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The maturation of clinical research informatics as a subdomain of biomedical informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jae Hyun KimDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Casey N TaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Cong LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Cynthia SungHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Alex M ButlerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Latoya A StewartDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Lyudmila EnaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
James R RogersDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Junghwan LeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Anna OstropoletsDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Patrick B RyanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Hao LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Shing M LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Mitchell S V ElkindDepartment of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Chunhua WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Bridging the Semantic Gap Between Research Eligibility Criteria and Clinical DataR01LM009886 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WENG, CHUNHUA · 2009 to 2020
$5.3M
Translator Red Knowledge (TReK)OT2TR003434 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DUMONTIER, MICHEL, TA, CASEY NGHIA · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS OT2 TR003434NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis research aims to evaluate the impact of eligibility criteria on recruitment and observable clinical outcomes of COVID-19 clinical trials using electronic health record (EHR) data. MATERIALS AND

methodsOn June 18, 2020, we identified frequently used eligibility criteria from all the interventional COVID-19 trials in ClinicalTrials.gov (n = 288), including age, pregnancy, oxygen saturation, alanine/aspartate aminotransferase, platelets, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. We applied the frequently used criteria to the EHR data of COVID-19 patients in Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) (March 2020-June 2020) and evaluated their impact on patient accrual and the occurrence of a composite endpoint of mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, and in-hospital death.

resultsThere were 3251 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from the CUIMC EHR included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 10 days (interquartile range 4-28 days). The composite events occurred in 18.1% (n = 587) of the COVID-19 cohort during the follow-up. In a hypothetical trial with common eligibility criteria, 33.6% (690/2051) were eligible among patients with evaluable data and 22.2% (153/690) had the composite event. DISCUSSION: By adjusting the thresholds of common eligibility criteria based on the characteristics of COVID-19 patients, we could observe more composite events from fewer patients.

conclusionsThis research demonstrated the potential of using the EHR data of COVID-19 patients to inform the selection of eligibility criteria and their thresholds, supporting data-driven optimization of participant selection towards improved statistical power of COVID-19 trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicElectronic Health RecordsEligibility DeterminationAdolescentAdultAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenPatient SelectionPregnancyResearch DesignOxygenclinical trialCOVID-19, criteria optimizationeligibility criteriareal-world data

Identifiers

PMID33260201
PMCPMC7798960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.