Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33259489›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Psycho-social impacts, experiences and perspectives of patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis regarding treatment options and case management: An exploratory qualitative study in Tunisia.

Aicha Boukthir, Jihene Bettaieb, Astrid C Erber, Hind Bouguerra, Rym Mallekh, Ikbel Naouar, Adel Gharbi, Manal Alghamdi, Emma Plugge, Piero Olliaro and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Aicha BoukthirDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-3903-2141
Jihene BettaiebDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-0056-452X
Astrid C ErberDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-9676
Hind BouguerraObservatoire National des Maladies Nouvelles et Emergentes, Tunis, Tunisia.
Rym MallekhDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-6645-5089
Ikbel NaouarDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Adel GharbiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Manal AlghamdiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Emma PluggeUK Collaborating Centre for the WHO Health in Prisons Programme, Public Health England, Reading, United Kingdom.
Piero OlliaroNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Afif Ben SalahDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Institut Pasteur de Tunis · TNUniversity of Oxford · GBArabian Gulf University · BHPublic Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although non-fatal and mostly self-healing in the case of Leishmania (L.) major, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is mainly treated to reduce lesion healing time. Less attention is paid to the improvement of scars, especially in aesthetically relevant areas of the body, which can dramatically affect patients' wellbeing. We explored patients' perspectives about treatment options and the social and psychological burden of disease (lesion and scar). Individual in-depth interviews were conducted with ten confirmed CL patients at two L. major endemic sites in Southern Tunisia (Sidi Bouzid and Gafsa). Participants were selected using a sampling approach along a spectrum covering e.g. age, sex, and clinical presentation. Patients' experiences, opinions and preferences were explored, and their detailed accounts gave an insight on the impact of CL on their everyday lives. The impact of CL was found to be considerable. Most patients were not satisfied with treatment performance and case management. They expected a shorter healing time and better accessibility of the health system. Tolerance of the burden of disease was variable and ranged from acceptance of hidden scars to suicidal thoughts resulting from the fear to become handicapped, and the stress caused by close relatives. Some believed CL to be a form of skin cancer. Unexpectedly, this finding shows the big gap between the perspectives of patients and assumptions of health professionals regarding this disease. This study provided valuable information for better case management emphasizing the importance of improving communication with patients, and accessibility to treatment. It generated context-specific knowledge to policy makers in Tunisia to implement effective case management in a country where access to treatment remains a challenge due to socio-economic and geographic barriers despite a long tradition in CL control.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCicatrixFemaleHumansLeishmania majorLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTunisia

Identifiers

PMID33259489
PMCPMC7707605
OpenAlexW3106983148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.