Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33259269›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2021

Male Voiding Behavior: Insight from 19,824 At-Home Uroflow Profiles.

Stephen J Summers, Joseph M Armstrong, Steven A Kaplan, Alex E Te, Alvin Le, Scott M Heiner, Angela P Presson, Guo Wei, James M Hotaling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of proudP A sound-based approach to uroflowmetry.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical validation of an audio-based uroflowmetry application in adult males.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephen J SummersDepartment of Urology, University of Utah Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Joseph M ArmstrongDepartment of Urology, University of Utah Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Steven A KaplanDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Alex E TeDepartment of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
Alvin LeStreamDx, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Scott M HeinerDepartment of Urology, University of Utah Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Angela P PressonDepartment of Urology, University of Utah Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Guo WeiDepartment of Urology, University of Utah Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
James M HotalingDepartment of Urology, University of Utah Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Stream Dx: Point of Care Cellular Enabled IoT Communication Hub for Improved Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Post-Treatment Evaluation of LUTSR44DK113878 · NIDDK · STREAM DX, INC. · PI HOTALING, JAMES, MCCLELLAN, SCOTT BRADFORD · 2017 to 2021
$4.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NIDDK NIH HHS R44 DK113878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBenign prostatic hyperplasia is one of the most common conditions seen by a general urologist. Validated questionnaires provide insight into patient symptoms, however office based uroflow devices are limited by the variability of voiding behavior. Using a home uroflow device, we assessed individual voiding variability, temporal distribution of voiding parameters and the impact of age on voiding. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween April 2019 and June 2020, 19,824 unique voiding profiles were captured using the Stream Dx Uroflowmeter and retrospectively analyzed. Age and number of voids were summarized by mean±standard deviation. We used mixed effects models to compare average values and intrapatient variability of voiding parameters to time of day and age. The coefficient of variation was used to assess intrapatient variability.

resultsA total of 637 patients were identified with 625 meeting inclusion criteria, producing 19,824 voids. Mean age was 67 (±10.2) years old, and each patient provided on average 5 (±3.3) voids a day through 7 days. Average intrapatient voiding parameters showed notable variability, where the coefficient of variation for maximum flow was 27.6% (95% CI 26.6-28.6). Early morning voids were associated with higher volume and lower number of voids. As age progressed, voiding profiles worsened in a linear fashion. Afternoon and evening voids were associated with reduced intrapatient variability relative to early morning voids.

conclusionsAssessment of 19,824 uroflows using an accurate and precise home uroflow device demonstrates that an individual's voiding parameters vary greatly from day to day, throughout the day, and worsen with age. Multiple measurements performed at home provides a more realistic assessment of true voiding behavior by capturing individual voiding variability and can help urologists make better decisions in patient care.

Indexed as

UrodynamicsAgedHumansMaleProstatic HyperplasiaRetrospective StudiesSelf CareUrination Disordersprostateprostatic hyperplasia

Identifiers

PMID33259269
PMCPMC8411883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.