Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33259041›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020

Patient experiences with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a conceptual model of symptoms and impacts on quality of life.

Erica Zaiser, Amy J Sehnert, Ashley Duenas, Sara Saberi, Ella Brookes, Matthew Reaney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Efficacy of aficamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erica ZaiserEvidera, London, UK.
Amy J SehnertMyoKardia, Inc, Brisbane, California, USA.
Ashley DuenasEvidera, London, UK.
Sara SaberiFrankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan Hospital, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ella BrookesEvidera, London, UK.
Matthew ReaneyIQVIA, 3 Forbury Place, 23 Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 3JH, UK. matthew.reaney@iqvia.com.
EVRAZ (United Kingdom) · GBIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GBMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary myocardial disorder defined by left ventricular hypertrophy that cannot be explained by another cardiac or systemic disease. There is a general lack of knowledge about patients' perspectives on the symptoms and day-to-day limitations they experience as a result of HCM. We therefore sought an in-depth understanding of patients' experiences of obstructive (oHCM) and nonobstructive (nHCM) forms of the disease, including symptoms and their quality of life impacts, and to develop a conceptual model to capture them.

methodsDevelopment of the HCM conceptual model involved a web-based survey to capture patients' insights, a targeted literature review (which included relevant guidelines and patient advocacy websites), one-to-one interviews with clinical experts, and one-to-one qualitative concept elicitation interviews with patients. Key symptoms and their impacts most important to patients' experiences were identified and used to develop a conceptual model of the patient experience with HCM.

resultsThe HCM symptoms reported by patient interviewees (n = 27) were largely consistent with findings from the patient web survey (n = 444), literature review, and interviews with three expert clinicians. The symptoms most commonly reported in patient interviews included tiredness (89%), shortness of breath (89%), shortness of breath with physical activity (89%), and dizziness/light-headedness (89%). Other symptoms commonly reported included chest pain (angina) (70%), chest pain (angina) with physical exertion (70%), and palpitations (fluttering or rapid heartbeat) (81%). The most commonly reported impacts of HCM symptoms on patients' lives included limitations to physical activities (78%), emotional impacts, including feeling anxious or depressed (78%), and impacts on work (63%). Symptoms and impacts were similar for both oHCM and nHCM.

conclusionsA conceptual model was developed, which identifies the core symptoms that patients with oHCM and nHCM reported as most frequent and most important: shortness of breath, palpitations, fatigue/tiredness, dizziness/light-headedness, and chest pain, as well as the impacts those symptoms have on patients' lives. This HCM conceptual model reflecting patients' experiences and perspectives was used in the development of a patient-reported outcomes instrument for use in clinical trials and it may also help inform the clinical management of HCM.

Indexed as

Burden of diseaseConceptual modelHCM symptomsHypertrophic cardiomyopathyPatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeShortness of breath

Identifiers

PMID33259041
PMCPMC7708573
OpenAlexW3108565458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.