Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33258990›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2021

[Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) : Retrospective analysis of a load and go strategy under the aspect of golden hour of eCPR].

Christian Reyher, Sarah R Karst, Ralf M Muellenbach, Christopher Lotz, Asghar A Peivandi, Vincent Boersch, Klaus Weber, Rainer Gradaus, Caroline Rolfes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ECPR-the evolving role in cardiac arrest.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  4. [Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-An orientation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2023.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian ReyherKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, ECMO-Zentrum, Klinikum Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125, Kassel, Deutschland. christian.reyher@klinikum-kassel.de.
Sarah R KarstKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, ECMO-Zentrum, Klinikum Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125, Kassel, Deutschland.
Ralf M MuellenbachKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, ECMO-Zentrum, Klinikum Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125, Kassel, Deutschland.
Christopher LotzKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Asghar A PeivandiKlinik für Herzchirurgie, ECMO-Zentrum, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland.
Vincent BoerschKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, ECMO-Zentrum, Klinikum Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125, Kassel, Deutschland.
Klaus WeberInterdisziplinäre Zentrale Notaufnahme, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland.
Rainer GradausKlinik für Kardiologie, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland.
Caroline RolfesKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, ECMO-Zentrum, Klinikum Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125, Kassel, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival rates after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remain low. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) has been introduced as an attempt to increase survival in selected patients and observational studies have shown promising results. Nevertheless, inclusion criteria and timing of eCPR remain undefined.

objectiveThe current study analyzed a load and go strategy with respect to the golden hour of eCPR as a cut-off time for survival and favorable neurological outcome. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 32 patients who underwent eCPR treatment due to an OHCA between January 2017 and September 2019. Routinely taken patient demographic data (age, BMI, sex) were analyzed. The main focus was set on processing times in the preclinical and clinical setting. Time intervals including OHCA until ambulance arrival, time on scene, transportation times and door to eCPR were extracted from emergency medical service (EMS) and resuscitation protocols. Low-flow times, survival and neurological outcome were analyzed.

resultsThe use of eCPR in OHCA was associated with survival to hospital discharge in 28% and a good neurological outcome in 19% of the cases. Both groups (survivor and nonsurvivor) did not differ in patient demographics except for age. Survivors were significantly younger (47 (30-60) vs. 59 (50-68) years, p = 0.035). Processing times as well as low-flow times were not significantly different (OHCA-eCPR survivor 64 (50-87) vs. non-survivor 74 (51-85) min; p-value 0.64); however, median low-flow times were outside the golden hour of eCPR (69 (52-86)).

conclusionDespite low-flow times of more than 60 min, eCPR was associated with survival in 28% after OHCA. Hence, exceeding the golden hour of eCPR cannot act as a definitive exclusion criterion for eCPR.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestHumansRetrospective StudiesCardiac arrestExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationHeart-lung maschinePreclinicalResuscitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.