Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33258786›Full record

ReviewJMIR pediatrics and parenting2020

Usability of eHealth and Mobile Health Interventions by Young People Living With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Systematic Review.

Sonia Butler, Dean Sculley, Derek Santos Santos, Antoni Fellas, Xavier Gironès, Davinder Singh-Grewal, Andrea Coda

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sonia Butler *School of Bioscience and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5492-7966
Dean Sculley *School of Bioscience and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3972-8309
Derek Santos Santos *School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-715X
Antoni Fellas *School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1557-6232
Xavier Gironès *Director of Research and Innovation, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Manresa (Barcelona), Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2329-5927
Davinder Singh-Grewal *Department of Rheumatology, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Randwick and Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7306-3713
Andrea Coda *School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0427-6672
Hunter Water · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUQueen Margaret University · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsidering the changing landscape of internet use and rising ownership of digital technology by young people, new methods could be considered to improve the current model of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) management.

objectiveThis systematic review aims to evaluate the usability of eHealth and mobile health (mHealth) interventions currently available for young people living with JIA.

methodsThe PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used to oversee this review. We systematically searched 15 databases for 252 potential studies; 2 authors independently screened all quantitative studies reporting the use of eHealth and mHealth interventions for young people (aged 1-18 years) diagnosed with JIA. Studies were excluded if they did not report outcome measures or were reviews, commentaries, or qualitative studies. Study methodological quality was scored using the Down and Black (modified) checklist. A narrative descriptive methodology was used to quantify the data because of heterogeneity across the studies.

resultsA total of 11 studies were included in this review, reporting 7 eHealth and mHealth interventions for young people (aged 4-18 years) living with JIA, targeting health issues such as pain, health-related quality of life, physical activity, and chronic disease self-management. The usability of the interventions was facilitated through training and ongoing support. The engagement was promoted by a combination of persuasive influences, and barriers preventing adherence were removed through personal reminders and flexible program schedules to cater to JIA and non-JIA illnesses or other commonly seen activities in childhood. The feedback obtained was that most young people and their parents liked the interventions.

conclusionsThe results of this review need to be considered cautiously because of the lack of rigorous testing and heterogeneity, which limits the detailed descriptions of data synthesis. Further research is needed to consider gender differences, associated costs, and the effectiveness of the interventions on health outcomes to better support young people living with JIA.

Indexed as

adolescencechildeHealthjuvenile idiopathic arthritismHealthmobile phonepainphysical activityquality of lifeself-managementsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33258786
PMCPMC7738264
OpenAlexW2996041097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.