Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33258774›Full record

Trial reportEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2021

Super high-pressure balloon versus scoring balloon to prepare severely calcified coronary lesions: the ISAR-CALC randomised trial.

Tobias Rheude, Himanshu Rai, Gert Richardt, Abdelhakim Allali, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Dmitriy S Sulimov, Kambis Mashayekhi, Mohamed Ayoub, Florim Cuculi, Matthias Bossard and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07093788 (Super High-pressure Balloon Versus Intravascular Lithotripsy to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07093788 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Super High-pressure Balloon Versus Intravascular Lithotripsy to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: a Randomized Controlled Trial (Shape)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled78ConditionsPCI, Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Calcified Coronary LesionsArmssuper high-pressure balloon, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Network meta-analysis of treatment strategies for calcified coronary lesions.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Rotational atherectomy combined with cutting balloon to optimise stent expansion in calcified lesions: the ROTA-CUT randomised trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Calcium modifying dedicated balloons: a contemporary review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Optimal Stent Expansion Indices for Predicting Outcomes in PCI of Calcified Coronary Lesions.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Impact of coronary calcium morphology on intravascular lithotripsy.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Coronary artery calcification: concepts and clinical applications.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Coronary calcifications, the Achilles heel in coronary interventions.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Dedicated Balloon Techniques for Coronary Calcium Modification.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tobias RheudeKlinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Himanshu Rai
Gert Richardt
Abdelhakim Allali
Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Dmitriy S Sulimov
Kambis Mashayekhi
Mohamed Ayoub
Florim Cuculi
Matthias Bossard
Sebastian Kufner
Erion Xhepa
Adnan Kastrati
Massimiliano Fusaro
Michael Joner
Robert A Byrne
Salvatore Cassese

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe comparative efficacy of balloon-based techniques to prepare severely calcified coronary lesions before stenting remains poorly studied.

aimsWe sought to compare stent expansion following preparation of severely calcified coronary lesions with either a super high-pressure balloon or a scoring balloon.

methodsIn this randomised, open-label trial, patients with severely calcified coronary lesions were enrolled at five centres in Germany and Switzerland. After unsuccessful lesion preparation with a standard non-compliant balloon (<30% reduction of baseline diameter stenosis), participants were randomised to predilation with either a super high-pressure balloon or a scoring balloon before drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The primary endpoint of the study was stent expansion index as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The key secondary endpoints included angiographic, strategy and procedural success.

resultsOCT data after DES implantation were available for 70 out of 74 patients (94.6%) enrolled. Lesion preparation with a super high-pressure balloon versus a scoring balloon led to a comparable stent expansion index (0.72±0.12 vs 0.68±0.13; p=0.22). Compared with the scoring balloon, the super high-pressure balloon increased the minimum lumen diameter (2.83±0.34 mm vs 2.65±0.36 mm; p=0.03) and reduced the diameter stenosis (11.6±4.8% vs 14.4±5.6%; p=0.02) without difference in terms of angiographic success (100% vs 97.3%; p>0.99). Strategy success (91.9% vs 83.8%; p=0.48) and procedural success (100% vs 89.2%; p=0.12) were numerically more frequent with the super high-pressure balloon versus the scoring balloon.

conclusionsIn patients with severely calcified coronary artery lesions, preparation with a super high-pressure balloon versus a scoring balloon was associated with comparable stent expansion on intravascular imaging and a trend towards improved angiographic performance. Visual summary. A ComparIson of Strategies to PrepAre SeveRely CALCified Coronary Lesions: the ISAR-CALC randomised trial.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsCoronary AngiographyHumansStentsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33258774
PMCPMC9724952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.