Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33258478›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of work, environment & health2021

Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries.

Irina Guseva Canu, Sandy Carla Marca, Francesca Dell'Oro, Ádám Balázs, Enrico Bergamaschi, Christine Besse, Renzo Bianchi, Jovanka Bislimovska, Adrijana Koscec Bjelajac, Merete Bugge and 35 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Biological Markers of Burnout Severity: A Systematic Review.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Determinants of Burnout among Teachers: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Predictors of Occupational Burnout: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  12. Psychometric properties of burnout measures: a systematic review.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

45 authors.

Irina Guseva CanuUnisanté, Department of occupational and environmental health, Route de la Corniche, 2, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland. irina.guseva-canu@unisante.ch.
Sandy Carla Marca
Francesca Dell'Oro
Ádám Balázs
Enrico Bergamaschi
Christine Besse
Renzo Bianchi
Jovanka Bislimovska
Adrijana Koscec Bjelajac
Merete Bugge
Carmen Iliana Busneag
Çiğdem Çağlayan
Mariana Cernițanu
Cristiana Costa Pereira
Nataša Dernovšček Hafner
Nadia Droz
Maija Eglite
Lode Godderis
Harald Gündel
Jari J Hakanen
Raluca Maria Iordache
Imane Khireddine-Medouni
Sibel Kiran
Francesca Larese-Filon
Catherine Lazor-Blanchet
Patrick Légeron
Tom Loney
Nicole Majery
Eda Merisalu
Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum
Laurent Michaud
Dragan Mijakoski
Jordan Minov
Alberto Modenese
Marija Molan
Henk van der Molen
Evangelia Nena
Dusan Nolimal
Marina Otelea
Elisabeta Pletea
Nurka Pranjic
David Rebergen
Jelena Reste
Eva Schernhammer
Anny Wahlen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective A consensual definition of occupational burnout is currently lacking. We aimed to harmonize the definition of occupational burnout as a health outcome in medical research and reach a consensus on this definition within the Network on the Coordination and Harmonisation of European Occupational Cohorts (OMEGA-NET). Methods First, we performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase (January 1990 to August 2018) and a semantic analysis of the available definitions. We used the definitions of burnout and burnout-related concepts from the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) to formulate a consistent harmonized definition of the concept. Second, we sought to obtain the Delphi consensus on the proposed definition. Results We identified 88 unique definitions of burnout and assigned each of them to 1 of the 11 original definitions. The semantic analysis yielded a first proposal, further reformulated according to SNOMED-CT and the panelists` comments as follows: "In a worker, occupational burnout or occupational physical AND emotional exhaustion state is an exhaustion due to prolonged exposure to work-related problems". A panel of 50 experts (researchers and healthcare professionals with an interest for occupational burnout) reached consensus on this proposal at the second round of the Delphi, with 82% of experts agreeing on it. Conclusion This study resulted in a harmonized definition of occupational burnout approved by experts from 29 countries within OMEGA-NET. Future research should address the reproducibility of the Delphi consensus in a larger panel of experts, representing more countries, and examine the practicability of the definition.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalDelphi TechniqueHumansReproducibility of ResultsSemanticsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33258478
PMCPMC8114565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.