Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33258445›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2020

Current concepts in robotic total hip arthroplasty.

Pascal Kouyoumdjian, Jad Mansour, Chahine Assi, Jacques Caton, Sebastien Lustig, Remy Coulomb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A review of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pascal KouyoumdjianCentre Hospitalo-universitaire de Nîmes, Rue du Pr. Robert Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France - Université Montpellier 1, 2 Rue de l'École de Médecine, 34090 Montpellier, France - Laboratoire de Mécanique et Génie Civile (LMGC), CNRS-UM1, 860 Rue de St-Priest, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0717-9600
Jad MansourDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Lebanese American University-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Chahine AssiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Lebanese American University-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jacques CatonInstitut de chirurgie orthopédique, Lyon, France.
Sebastien LustigCentre Albert-Trillat, CHU Lyon Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69004 Lyon, France.
Remy CoulombCentre Hospitalo-universitaire de Nîmes, Rue du Pr. Robert Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France - Université Montpellier 1, 2 Rue de l'École de Médecine, 34090 Montpellier, France.
University Medical Center Rizk Hospital · LBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Orthopédique Santy · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTotal hip replacement provides mostly fair functional and clinical results. Many factors play an essential role in hip stability and long-term outcomes. Surgical positioning remains fundamental for obtaining accurate implant fit and prevent hip dislocation or impingement. Different categories of robotic assistance have been established throughout the previous years and all of the technologies target accuracy and reliability to reduce complications, and enhance clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn overview is proposed over the principles of robotic assistance in hip arthroplasty surgery. Accuracy, reliability, management of the bone stock, clinical outcomes, constraints and limits of this technology are reported, based on recent literature.

resultsPotential advantages regarding pre-operative planning accuracy, cup positioning, maintenance of the center of rotation, preservation of an adequate bone stock nay clinical short- and mid-term outcomes are balanced with some reported disadvantages and limits like hip anatomical specificity, cost-effectiveness, engineering dependence. DISCUSSION: The use of robotic-assisted THA presents clear and evident benefits related to accurate implant positioning and maintenance of a minimal bone while allowing. For some authors, an early improvement in functional results and patient's recovery. This technology demonstrated a shorter surgical time and a short learning curve required to optimize its use and this technology presents promising outcomes and results and potential use in routine clinical application but its limitation of use is still present especially the cost of the robot, the need for the presence of an engineer during the surgery, its availability of use in all hospitals as well as the difficulty presented in dysplastic or dysmorphic hip joints.

Indexed as

HipNavigationPlanningRobotSurgeryTHATotal Hip Replacement

Identifiers

PMID33258445
PMCPMC7705325
OpenAlexW3107273962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.