Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33258229›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2021

Planning Results for High Tibial Osteotomies in Degenerative Varus Osteoarthritis Using Standing and Supine Whole Leg Radiographs.

Benjamin Bockmann, Wolfgang Nebelung, Christoph K Boese, Tobias L Schulte, Arne J Venjakob

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin BockmannDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8927-3117
Wolfgang NebelungDepartment of Rheumatology and Arthroscopy, Marienkrankenhaus Düsseldorf-Kaiserswerth, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christoph K BoeseDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tobias L SchulteDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Arne J VenjakobDepartment of Rheumatology and Arthroscopy, Marienkrankenhaus Düsseldorf-Kaiserswerth, Düsseldorf, Germany.
St. Josef-Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this study, we hypothesized that standing and supine X-rays lead to different preoperative planning results.

methodsThe present study included 168 pictures from 81 patients who were treated surgically with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for varus deformity between January 2017 and February 2018. Each patient underwent whole leg X-ray examinations in both standing and supine position. On both images, the following parameters were measured: degree of axis deviation (DAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), width of medial (MJS) and lateral joint space (LJS), and the correction angle (CA). The results were correlated with the patients' age and body mass index (BMI). To analyze intra-observer reliability, the same researcher, blinded to the previous measurements, remeasured all X-rays from 10 patients 8 weeks after the initial measurements were carried out.

resultsWhile mLDFA (P = 0.075), mMPTA (P = 0.435), and MJS (P = 0.119) did not show any differences between the two modalities, LJS (P = 0.016) and DAD (P < 0.001) differed significantly, leading to different correction angles (P < 0.001). The mean difference of the CA was 1.7° ± 2.2° (range, -2.6° to-15.4°). In 14 legs (17%), the standing X-ray led to a correction angle that was at least 3° larger than the calculation revealed in the supine X-ray; in 4 legs (5%), it was at least 5° larger. Increased BMI (r = 0.191, P = 0.088) and older age (r = 0.057 , P = 0.605) did not show relevant correlation with DAD differences. However, more severe varus malalignment in the supine radiograph did correlate moderately with differences of correction angles between supine and weight-bearing radiographs (r = 0.414, P < 0.001). The analysis of the intra-rater reliability revealed mediocre to excellent intercorrelation coefficients between the measurements of the observer.

conclusionThe use of supine and standing X-ray images leads to different planning results when performing high tibial osteotomies for varus gonarthrosis. To avoid potential overcorrection, surgeons might consider increased lateral joint spaces on standing radiographs in osteoarthritic knees with varus deviation.

Indexed as

RadiographySitting PositionStanding PositionWeight-BearingFemaleHumansMaleOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteotomyPatient Care PlanningPreoperative PeriodReproducibility of ResultsKneeLeg axisOsteotomyTibiaVarus

Identifiers

PMID33258229
PMCPMC7862142
OpenAlexW3109022026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.