Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33258074›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2021

Unplanned hospital transfers from nursing homes: who is involved in the transfer decision? Results from the HOMERN study.

Alexandra Pulst, Alexander Maximilian Fassmer, Guido Schmiemann

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Nursing home-sensitive conditions and approaches to reduce hospitalization of nursing home residents].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra PulstDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany. a.pulst@uni-bremen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7997-6668
Alexander Maximilian FassmerDepartment of Health Services Research, School VI, Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-2546
Guido SchmiemannDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-6561

Funding

Innovation Fund coordinated by the Innovation Committee of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) 01VSF16055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department visits and hospital admissions are common among nursing home residents (NHRs) and seem to be higher in Germany than in other countries. Yet, research on characteristics of transfers and involved persons in the transfer decision is scarce.

aimsThe aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of hospital transfers from nursing homes (NHs) focused on contacts to physicians, family members and legal guardians prior to a transfer.

methodsWe conducted a multi-center study in 14 NHs in the regions Bremen and Lower Saxony (Northwestern Germany) between March 2018 and July 2019. Hospital transfers were documented for 12 months by nursing staff using a standardized questionnaire. Data were derived from care records and perspectives of nursing staff and were analyzed descriptively.

resultsAmong 802 included NHRs, n = 535 unplanned hospital transfers occurred of which 63.1% resulted in an admission. Main reasons were deterioration of health status (e.g. fever, infections, dyspnea and exsiccosis) (35.1%) and falls/accidents/injuries (33.5%). Within 48 h prior to transfer, contact to at least one general practitioner (GP)/specialist/out-of-hour-care physician was 46.2% and varied between the NHs (range: 32.3-83.3%). GPs were involved in only 34.8% of transfer decisions. Relatives and legal guardians were more often informed about transfer (62.3% and 66.8%) than involved in the decision (21.8% and 15.1%). DISCUSSION: Contacts to physicians and involvement of the GP were low prior to unplanned transfers. The ranges between the NHs may be explained by organizational differences.

conclusionImprovements in communication between nursing staff, physicians and others are required to reduce potentially avoidable transfers.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPatient TransferEmergency Service, HospitalGermanyHospitalizationHospitalsHumansNursing HomesDecision makingEmergency departmentHospital admissionHospitalizationNursing home residentsPatient transfer

Identifiers

PMID33258074
PMCPMC8302553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.