Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33258049›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

[Health information behavior of 65+: reaching older target groups].

Paula Stehr, Winja Weber, Constanze Rossmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula StehrSeminar für Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Universität Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Deutschland. paula.stehr@uni-erfurt.de.
Winja WeberSeminar für Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Universität Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Deutschland.
Constanze RossmannSeminar für Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Universität Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089, Erfurt, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proportion of older adults among the population is constantly growing. At the same time, the risk of health problems increases with age. From a health promotion perspective, it is therefore important to reach this target group. The selection of media and communication channels should be based on media use and health information behavior of the target group. In this context, it may be necessary to segment the heterogeneous group of older adults into subgroups.

objectivesThe article provides current empirical data on the health information behavior of older adults in general and in particular subgroups. On this basis, adequate communication channels can be selected to address these groups.

methodsFirst, 20 people participated in guided qualitative interviews. Second, a subsequent standardized telephone survey of 1001 randomly selected people aged 65 years and above was conducted.

resultsOlder adults can best be reached via interpersonal and traditional mass media sources. Health-related media such as pharmacy magazines also play an important role, especially for people with chronic diseases. Furthermore, health professionals are also an important source of information for older adults with chronic diseases and a negative attitude towards aging. On the internet, men and people with a higher income are more likely to be reached.

conclusionsOlder adults in Germany are a heterogeneous target group. To reach them effectively, differences in the health information behavior of subtarget groups must be considered. Furthermore, the content and design of communication measures should also be evidence based.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth PromotionAgedAgingGermanyHumansInternetMaleMass MediaAudience segmentationHealth information behaviorMedia strategyOlder adultsTheory- and evidence-based communication

Identifiers

PMID33258049
PMCPMC7772171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.