ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2021
Evaluation of mediastinoscopy in mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical nodal sampling established by Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8 is essential for accurate lung cancer staging.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Mediastinal staging and restaging techniques in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of neoadjuvant and perioperative chemoimmunotherapy-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Is It Time to (Re)define the N-Category for Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?The clinical respiratory journal · 2024Article
- Diagnostic modalities in the mediastinum and the role of bronchoscopy in mediastinal assessment: a narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Review
- A novel nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis in cT1 non-small-cell lung cancer based on PET/CT and peripheral blood cell parameters.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration to evaluate the status of N2 in preoperative non-small cell lung cancer: a diagnostic test.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the quality of video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopy (VACM) in the staging of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the Antwerp University Hospital with a focus on test effectiveness indicators, morbidity and unforeseen pN2 results.
methodsAll consecutive VACM workups of cases of NSCLC performed between January 2010 and December 2015 were included to assess overall test quality and effectiveness. Quality assurance was performed in accordance with the recommendations of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) where appropriate.
resultsA total of 168 video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopies were included. A total of 91.7% of the procedures were performed in accordance with the ESTS guideline. An unforeseen pN2 staging was identified in 10 anatomical lung resections (8.6%). Statistical analysis showed no significant association between VACM performed in accordance with the ESTS guideline and the presence of pN2 positive lymph nodes [χ2 (1) = 0.61; P = 0.57] and no association between VACM performed in accordance with the ESTS guideline and overall futile thoracotomy [χ2 (1) = 0.76; P = 0.50]. Calculations revealed a sensitivity of 81.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 69.1-90.9], specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 91.9% (95% CI 86.6-95.2) and diagnostic accuracy of 94.1% (95% CI 89.33-97.11).
conclusionsOverall, 91.7% of the VACM were performed in accordance with the ESTS guideline. This process resulted in a sensitivity of 81.8%, a negative predictive value of 91.9% and an unforeseen pN2 rate of 8.6%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.