ArticleScientific reports2020
The relationship between
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Efficacy of PET/CT-Aided versus Conventional CT-guided Lung Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisCurrent medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in Conjunction with Lung Cancer Stage and PET-CT SUVmax.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of liver-to-muscle FDG uptake ratio and ınflammatory biomarkers in small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Case Report: IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis presenting as an infiltrative cystic-solid pancreatic mass: lessons from a diagnostic pitfall.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of sarcopenia on 5-year overall and progression-free survival in lung cancer patients: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Detection of cancer-associated cachexia in lung cancer patients using whole-body [Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Article
- Clinical impact of inflammatory and nutrition index based on metabolic tumor activity in non‑small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Obesity and lung cancer-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
- Volumetric parameters of the primary tumor and whole-body tumor burden derived from baselineEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2022Article
- The Association between Muscle Quantity and Overall Survival Depends on Muscle Radiodensity: A Cohort Study in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Prognostic value of computed tomography derived skeletal muscle mass index in lung cancer: A meta-analysis.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Multimodal analysis suggests differential immuno-metabolic crosstalk in lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2022Article
- The combined role of PET/CT metabolic parameters and inflammatory markers in detecting extensive disease in small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Imaging modalities for diagnosis and monitoring of cancer cachexia.EJNMMI research · 2021Review
- Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Predicting outcomes of Lung Cancer using the modified glasgow prognostic score: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between PET-CT derived tumour glucose uptake as measured by maximum standard glucose uptake (SUVmax) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), nutritional risk as measured by the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), CT derived body composition as measured by skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD), the systemic inflammatory response as measured by the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and survival in patients with lung cancer, treated with radiotherapy. In a retrospective cohort study, 119 patients were included in final analyses. The majority of patients were over 65 (86%), female (52%), had a performance status (ECOG-PS) of 0 or 1 (57%), were at nutritional risk (57%), were overweight (53%), had visceral obesity (62%), had a normal SMI (51%), had a low SMD (62%) and were systemically inflammed (mGPS 1/2, 51%). An elevated TLG was associated with sex (p < 0.05), TNM stage (p < 0.001), MUST (p < 0.01) and mGPS (p < 0.01). An elevated mGPS was associated with age (p < 0.05), NLR (p < 0.01), MUST (p < 0.01), and TLG (p < 0.01). On univariate survival analysis, TNM stage (p < 0.01), mGPS (p < 0.05), NLR (p < 0.01), MUST (p ≤ 0.001), Low SMD (p < 0.05), SUVmax (p ≤ 0.001) and TLG (p < 0.001) were associated with overall survival. On multivariate survival analysis MUST (HR: 1.49 95%CI 1.12-01.98 p < 0.01) and TLG (HR: 2.02 95%CI 1.34-3.04 p = 0.001) remained independently associated with survival. In conclusion, elevated tumour metabolic activity was associated with more advanced stage, greater nutritional risk, the systemic inflammatory response and poorer survival but not body composition analysis in patients with lung cancer. These results suggest that detrimental body composition is not directly determined by tumour metabolic activity but rather an ongoing systemic inflammatory response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.