Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33257672›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2020

Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX phase II randomized clinical trial for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Birendra Kumar Sah, Benyan Zhang, Huan Zhang, Jian Li, Fei Yuan, Tao Ma, Min Shi, Wei Xu, Zhenglun Zhu, Wentao Liu and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03636893 (Dragon III- Phase 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03636893 phase2completednot on this map

Dragon III- Phase 2: The Preliminary Efficacy Study of FLOT Versus SOX Regimen as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2018 to 2025Enrolled74ConditionsGastric Cancer, Chemotherapy EffectArmsFLOT Chemotherapy, SOX Chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Birendra Kumar SahDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China. rjsurgeon@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7415-960X
Benyan ZhangDepartment of Pathology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Huan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jian LiClinical Research Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fei YuanDepartment of Pathology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tao MaDepartment of Medical Oncology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Min ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei XuDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China.
Zhenglun ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China.
Wentao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China.
Chao YanDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China.
Chen LiDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China. lc10897@rjh.com.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-7157-5202
Bingya LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4406-3762
Min YanDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China.
Zhenggang ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China. zzg@rjh.com.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4769-5463
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FLOT regimen) has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). However, tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. Here, we conduct an open label, two-arm, phase II randomized interventional clinical trial (Dragon III; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03636893) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens. Patients with LAGC are randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen (40 patients) or 3 cycles of the SOX regimen (34 patients) before gastrectomy. The primary endpoint is the comparison of complete (TRG1a) or subtotal (TRG1b) tumor regression grading in the primary tumor. There are no significant differences in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. No significant differences in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT group and the SOX group are found. Complete or subtotal TRG is 20.0% in the FLOT group versus 32.4% in the SOX group. Therefore, our study does not find statistically significant differences between neoadjuvant FLOT and SOX regimens for the primary outcomes reported here in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantChinaDocetaxelFemaleFluorouracilGastrectomyHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityNeoadjuvant TherapyDocetaxelFluorouracilLeucovorinOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID33257672
PMCPMC7705676
OpenAlexW3110463492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.