Trial reportNature communications2020
Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX phase II randomized clinical trial for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03636893 (Dragon III- Phase 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dragon III- Phase 2: The Preliminary Efficacy Study of FLOT Versus SOX Regimen as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal neoadjuvant regimens for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2022Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Perioperative Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: 3-Year Follow-Up of NEOSUMMIT-01 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Pathologic Response of Phase III Study: Perioperative Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib and Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (DRAGON IV/CAP 05).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) for the treatment of locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (MATCH): an open-label, randomized, phase 2 clinical trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024Trial
- Perioperative toripalimab and chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A phase II, single-arm study.Cancer medicine · 2024Trial
- Article
- Clinical Impact of Low-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CCL8-dependent recruitment of natural killer cells enhances the antitumor activity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
- In search of the best perioperative treatment for gastroesophageal cancer: is there a role for antiangiogenesis?Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Tumor microenvironment dynamics in gastric cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Bridging paradigms and shaping the future of resectable gastric cancer: a narrative review of the post-MATTERHORN era.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- FLOT versus SOX as immunochemotherapy backbones for neoadjuvant or conversion therapy in gastric cancer: efficacy, toxicity, and postoperative safety in a real-world cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor combined with FLOT versus SOX for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Baseline thyroid function and treatment-emergent thyroid dysfunction predict pathological response and survival after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: Evolving Approaches and Supporting Evidence.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Adjuvant FLOT provides survival benefit for oesophagogastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma patients with low tumour regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FLOT regimen) has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). However, tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. Here, we conduct an open label, two-arm, phase II randomized interventional clinical trial (Dragon III; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03636893) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens. Patients with LAGC are randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen (40 patients) or 3 cycles of the SOX regimen (34 patients) before gastrectomy. The primary endpoint is the comparison of complete (TRG1a) or subtotal (TRG1b) tumor regression grading in the primary tumor. There are no significant differences in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. No significant differences in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT group and the SOX group are found. Complete or subtotal TRG is 20.0% in the FLOT group versus 32.4% in the SOX group. Therefore, our study does not find statistically significant differences between neoadjuvant FLOT and SOX regimens for the primary outcomes reported here in locally advanced gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.