Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33257659›Full record

ArticleScientific data2020

Data-science ready, multisite, human diffusion MRI white-matter-tract statistics.

Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga, Pratik Mukherjee, Michael L Perry, Brian A Wandell

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Garikoitz Lerma-UsabiagaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Jordan Hall Building, 94305, Stanford, California, USA. garikoitz@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9800-4816
Pratik MukherjeeRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael L PerryDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Jordan Hall Building, 94305, Stanford, California, USA.
Brian A WandellDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Jordan Hall Building, 94305, Stanford, California, USA.
Neurosciences Institute · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

European Commission (EC) H2020-MSCA-IF-2017-795807-ReCiModel
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The white matter tracts in the living human brain are critical for healthy function, and the diffusion MRI measured in these tracts is correlated with diverse behavioral measures. The technical skills required to analyze diffusion MRI data are complex: data acquisition requires MRI sequence development and acquisition expertise, analyzing raw-data into meaningful summary statistics requires computational neuroimaging and neuroanatomy expertise. The human white matter study field will advance faster if the tract summaries are available in plain data-science-ready format for non-diffusion MRI experts, such as statisticians, computer graphic researchers or data scientists in general. Here, we share a curated and processed dataset from three different MRI centers in a format that is data-science ready. The multisite data we share include measures of within and between MRI center variation in white-matter-tract diffusion measurements. Along with the dataset description and summary statistics, we describe the state-of-the-art computational system that guarantees reproducibility and provenance from the original scanner output.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingBrainData ScienceHumansWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID33257659
PMCPMC7705748
OpenAlexW3107745514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.