Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33257481›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Mothers' experiences of perinatal care in Belgian public hospitals: exploring the social inequalities. Protocol for a cross-sectional survey.

Claudia Schönborn, Katia Castetbon, Mouctar Sow, Judith Racape, Myriam De Spiegelaere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia SchönbornResearch Centre in Social Approaches to Health, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium claudia.schoenborn@ulb.be.ORCID 0000-0002-4524-7192
Katia CastetbonResearch Centre in Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Mouctar SowResearch Centre in Social Approaches to Health, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8038-6326
Judith RacapeResearch Centre in Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Myriam De SpiegelaereResearch Centre in Social Approaches to Health, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn Europe, the social inequalities in perinatal health are usually found to be to the disadvantage of non-European immigrants and women with lower levels of education and income. Among the possible underlying mechanisms are inadequate access to healthcare services and suboptimal care. To explore this hypothesis in the Belgian context, our research will describe detailed maternal socioeconomic and migration characteristics, explore how these factors relate to each other, and how they relate to women's perinatal care trajectories and experiences of care.

methodsUsing a modified version of the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire, we will survey 900 mothers of Belgian nationality or a nationality from a North or Sub-Saharan African country, and having given birth in four maternity wards in Brussels. The questionnaire has been adapted to the study objectives and the Belgian context. Interviewers will administer the 116-item questionnaire to all women agreeing to participate and meeting inclusion criteria, within 14 days of having given birth. Clinical information will be extracted from hospital records. ANALYSIS: We will estimate the associations of women's socioeconomic and migration characteristics with:Women's antenatal care trajectories (timing of first antenatal consultation, minimum recommended number of consultations, and problems accessing care).Obstetric practices such as episiotomies, emergency caesarean sections, and inductions.Patient experience such as feelings of discrimination, respect, and understanding of information.We will use descriptive statistics, multiple correspondence analysis, and simple and multiple logistic regressions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the hospital Ethics Committees and from the Université libre de Bruxelles (No: P2017/055/B406201730877). Written informed consent will be sought from all participants.In addition to disseminating findings and recommendations to the scientific community through open-source journal articles and conferences, we will also address local organisations and healthcare professionals via a written report and seminars.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesMothersBelgiumChildCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansInfant, NewbornPerinatal CarePregnancySocioeconomic Factorsperinatologypublic healthquality in health caresocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID33257481
PMCPMC7705495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.