Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33257440›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2020

Measuring urbanicity as a risk factor for childhood wheeze in a transitional area of coastal ecuador: a cross-sectional analysis.

Alejandro Rodriguez, Laura Rodrigues, Martha Chico, Maritza Vaca, Mauricio Lima Barreto, Elizabeth Brickley, Philip J Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alejandro RodriguezFacultad de ciencias Médicas de la salud y la Vida, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador alerodriguez.alv@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1867-0331
Laura RodriguesFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Martha ChicoSCAALA project, Fundacion Ecuatoriana para la Investigacion en Salud (FEPIS), Quininde, Esmeraldas, Ecuador.
Maritza VacaSCAALA project, Fundacion Ecuatoriana para la Investigacion en Salud (FEPIS), Quininde, Esmeraldas, Ecuador.
Mauricio Lima BarretoCentro de de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde (CIDACS) FIOCRUZ, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Elizabeth BrickleyFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Philip J CooperFacultad de ciencias Médicas de la salud y la Vida, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 072405/Z/03/ZWellcome Trust 088862/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe urbanisation process has been associated with increases in asthma prevalence, an observation supported largely by studies comparing urban with rural populations. The nature of this association remains poorly understood, likely because of the limitations of the urban-rural approach to understand what a multidimensional process is.

objectiveThis study explored the relationship between the urbanisation process and asthma prevalence using a multidimensional and quantitative measure of urbanicity.

methodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted in 1843 children living in areas with diverse levels of urbanisation in the district of Quinindé, Ecuador in 2013-2015. Categorical principal components analysis was used to generate an urbanicity score derived from 18 indicators measured at census ward level based on data from the national census in 2010. Indicators represent demographic, socioeconomic, built environment and geographical dimensions of the urbanisation process. Geographical information system analysis was used to allocate observations and urban characteristics to census wards. Logistic random effects regression models were used to identify associations between urbanicity score, urban indicators and three widely used definitions for asthma.

resultsThe prevalence of wheeze ever, current wheeze and doctor diagnosis of asthma was 33.3%, 13% and 6.9%, respectively. The urbanicity score ranged 0-10. Positive significant associations were observed between the urbanicity score and wheeze ever (adjusted OR=1.033, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.05) and doctor diagnosis (adjusted OR=1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.1, p=0.001). For each point of increase in urbanicity score, the prevalence of wheeze ever and doctor diagnosis of asthma increased by 3.3% and 6%, respectively. Variables related to socioeconomic and geographical dimensions of the urbanisation process were associated with greater prevalence of wheeze/asthma outcomes.

conclusionsEven small increases in urbanicity are associated with a higher prevalence of asthma in an area undergoing the urban transition. The use of a multidimensional urbanicity indicator has greater explanatory power than the widely used urban-rural dichotomy to improve our understanding of how the process of urbanisation affects the risk of asthma.

Indexed as

AsthmaRespiratory SoundsUrban PopulationChildCross-Sectional StudiesEcuadorHumansRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesasthmaasthma epidemiologypaediatric asthma

Identifiers

PMID33257440
PMCPMC7705553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.