Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33257087›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2021

Assisted injection provider practices and motivations in Los Angeles and San Francisco California 2016-18.

Sarah Brothers, Alex H Kral, Lynn Wenger, Kelsey Simpson, Ricky N Bluthenthal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah BrothersDepartment of Sociology, Yale University, 493 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Electronic address: sarah.brothers@yale.edu.
Alex H KralBehavioral Health Research Division, RTI International, 2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 800, Berkeley, CA 94704, United States.
Lynn WengerBehavioral Health Research Division, RTI International, 2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 800, Berkeley, CA 94704, United States.
Kelsey SimpsonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Health Behavior Research Division, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA 90032, United States.
Ricky N BluthenthalDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Health Behavior Research Division, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA 90032, United States.
RTI International · USUniversity of Southern California · USYale University · US

Funding

Preventing injection initiation: The Change The Cycle Randomized Controlled TrialR01DA038965 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BLUTHENTHAL, RICKY N, KRAL, ALEXANDER H · 2015 to 2018
$3.0M
Cannabis use and health outcomes among opioid-using people who inject drugs in the context of cannabis legalizationR01DA046049 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BLUTHENTHAL, RICKY N, CORSI, KAREN F · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038965NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssisted injection is a high-risk and common practice among people who inject drugs (PWID) and occurs for diverse reasons according to qualitative research. To develop interventions for reducing assisted injection risks, it is important to understand the practices of PWID who provide injection assistance, including their motivations for providing assistance.

methodsUsing follow-up data from an efficacy trial among PWID recruited in Los Angeles and San Francisco, CA (n=601), we present descriptive statistics on motivations for providing injection assistance and use multivariable logistic regression modelling to examine factors associated with these motivations.

resultsPWID provided injection assistance most commonly to friends and acquaintances. A quarter provided assistance on a daily basis. The most common motivations for providing assistance were skill and injury prevention. PWID also provided assistance to stop pestering and for compensation in money or drugs. In separate models examining factors associated with the five main motivations, we found injury prevention to be associated with skill injecting others, neck injection, methamphetamine use, and recycling income. Pestering was associated with injury prevention, neck and hand injection, speedball use, and syringe selling. Skill was associated with injury prevention, neck and hand injection, being physically assaulted, and age. Providing assistance for money was associated with providing assistance for food or drugs, armpit injections, being female, and providing assistance more frequently. Providing assistance for drugs was associated with compensation in food or money, goofball injection, selling drugs, and panhandling.

conclusionProviding injection assistance is associated with injection needs of recipients and drug scene participation. We urgently need new interventions for reducing assisted injection risks. Since injection providers report being motivated by skill and to prevent injury, interventions such as training in safer injection techniques are likely to be met with enthusiasm.

Indexed as

MotivationSubstance Abuse, IntravenousFemaleHumansInjectionsLos AngelesSan FranciscoAssisted injectionHarm reductionInjection drug usePWID

Identifiers

PMID33257087
PMCPMC8155098
OpenAlexW3109441671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.