Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256986›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2021

Pain Management and Education for Ambulatory Surgery: A Qualitative Study of Perioperative Nurses.

Rohit Nallani, Cameron C Fox, Kevin J Sykes, Jennifer K Surprise, Clare E Fox, Alan D Reschke, Melanie H Simpson, Barbara J Polivka, Jennifer A Villwock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Impact of seamless intervention in the operating room combined with pain management on the efficiency of urological laparoscopic surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rohit NallaniDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. Electronic address: rnallani@kumc.edu.
Cameron C FoxUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.
Kevin J SykesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Jennifer K SurpriseInpatient Pain Management Nurses, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas.
Clare E FoxInpatient Pain Management Nurses, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas.
Alan D ReschkeInpatient Pain Management Nurses, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas.
Melanie H SimpsonInpatient Pain Management Nurses, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas.
Barbara J PolivkaSchool of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Jennifer A VillwockDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002367 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW W MOSCONI, NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2017 to 2026
$7.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulatory surgery presents unique challenges regarding adequate pain management and education. Studies have documented issues with transfer of information and patient comfort. Our objective was to explore perioperative nurses' perspectives of current practices and challenges with pain management and education. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used a qualitative descriptive design and conducted four focus group interviews, with 24 total participants from two perioperative areas of an academic medical center, using a standardized script. Using qualitative analysis software, two investigators reviewed the data and coded major themes and subthemes. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies guidelines were followed for reporting the data.

resultsWe identified four major themes impacting current perioperative pain management and education practices: communication among the perioperative care team, sources of nurses' frustrations in the perioperative setting, patient expectations for pain, and nurse-driven pain management and education. Nurses highlighted their work became easier with adequate information transfer and trust from physicians. Frustrations stemmed from surgeon, system, and patient factors. Nurses often use their clinical experience and judgment in managing patients throughout the perioperative period. Furthermore, nurses felt patients have limited pain education and stressed education throughout the surgical care pathway could improve overall care.

conclusionsPerioperative pain management, assessment, and education practices are inconsistent, incomplete, and sources of frustrations according to participants. Participant experiences highlight the need for improved and standardized models. Patient pain education should use a multidisciplinary approach, beginning at the point of surgery scheduling and continuing through postoperative follow-up.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresAttitude of Health PersonnelAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleMiddle AgedNursesPain ManagementPatient Care TeamPatient Education as TopicPerioperative CarePostoperative PainPractice Patterns, Nurses'Ambulatory surgeryNursingPain educationPain managementPerioperativeQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33256986
PMCPMC10165861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.