Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256957›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2020

Home Health Staff Perspectives on Infection Prevention and Control: Implications for Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz, Ashley M Chastain, Sabrina Mangal, Patricia W Stone, Jingjing Shang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring behavioural factors influencing COVID-19-specific infection prevention and control measures in Finland: a mixed-methods study, December 2020 to March 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika Pogorzelska-MaziarzCollege of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: Monika.Pogorzelska-Maziarz@jefferson.edu.
Ashley M ChastainCenter for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Sabrina MangalCenter for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Patricia W StoneCenter for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Jingjing ShangCenter for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Infection Prevention in Home Health Care (InHOME)R01NR016865 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHANG, JINGJING, STONE, PATRICIA W. · 2017 to 2025
$6.4M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe role of home healthcare (HHC) services in providing care to vulnerable, often frail individuals with chronic conditions is critical. Effective infection prevention and control (IPC) in HHC is essential to keeping both healthcare workers and patients safe, especially in the event of an emerging infectious disease outbreak. Prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, we explored successes and challenges with IPC from the perspectives of HHC staff.

designQualitative descriptive study. SETTING AND

participantsFrom May to November 2018, we conducted in-depth telephone interviews with 41 staff from 13 agencies across the nation.

methodsTranscripts were coded by a multidisciplinary coding team, and several primary and subcategories were identified using directed content analysis.

resultsFour primary categories were generated including (1) uniqueness of HHC; (2) IPC as a priority; (3) importance of education; and (4) keys to success and innovation. Participants perceived that IPC plays a big part in patient safety and reducing rehospitalizations, and protection of patients and staff was a major motivator for compliance with IPC. The identified challenges included the unpredictability of the home environment, patient/family dynamics, the intermittent nature of HHC, and staffing issues. Education was seen as a tool to improve staff, patient, caregiver and families' compliance with IPC. Keys to success and innovation included a leadership focus on quality, using agency infection data to improve quality, and a coordinated approach to patient care. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This qualitative work identified barriers to effective IPC in HHC, as well as important facilitators that HHC agencies can use to implement policies and procedures to improve patient care and keep staff safe. Leadership prioritization of IPC is key to implementing appropriate IPC policies and may be especially important in midst of a crisis such as coronavirus disease 2019.

Indexed as

Home Health NursingCOVID-19Cross InfectionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient SafetyQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementSARS-CoV-2Home healthcareinfection prevention and controlquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID33256957
PMCPMC7584445
OpenAlexW3093529330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.