Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256944›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2021

Natural language processing and entrustable professional activity text feedback in surgery: A machine learning model of resident autonomy.

Christopher C Stahl, Sarah A Jung, Alexandra A Rosser, Aaron S Kraut, Benjamin H Schnapp, Mary Westergaard, Azita G Hamedani, Rebecca M Minter, Jacob A Greenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EMYWAY Workplace-Based Entrustable Professional Activities Assessments in Otolaryngology Residency Training: A Nationwide Experience.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multi-disciplinary assessment of the entrustable professional activities of surgery residents.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher C StahlDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Sarah A JungDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Alexandra A RosserDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Aaron S KrautDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Benjamin H SchnappDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Mary WestergaardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Azita G HamedaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Rebecca M MinterDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Jacob A GreenbergDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: greenbergj@surgery.wisc.edu.

Funding

UW Surgical Oncology Research Training Program (UW-SORT)T32CA090217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Muhammed Murtaza, Heather B Neuman · 2001 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEntrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) contain narrative 'entrustment roadmaps' designed to describe specific behaviors associated with different entrustment levels. However, these roadmaps were created using expert committee consensus, with little data available for guidance. Analysis of actual EPA assessment narrative comments using natural language processing may enhance our understanding of resident entrustment in actual practice.

methodsAll text comments associated with EPA microassessments at a single institution were combined. EPA-entrustment level pairs (e.g. Gallbladder Disease-Level 1) were identified as documents. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), a common machine learning algorithm, was used to identify latent topics in the documents associated with a single EPA. These topics were then reviewed for interpretability by human raters.

resultsOver 18 months, 1015 faculty EPA microassessments were collected from 64 faculty for 80 residents. LDA analysis identified topics that mapped 1:1 to EPA entrustment levels (Gammas >0.99). These LDA topics appeared to trend coherently with entrustment levels (words demonstrating high entrustment were consistently found in high entrustment topics, word demonstrating low entrustment were found in low entrustment topics).

conclusionsLDA is capable of identifying topics relevant to progressive surgical entrustment and autonomy in EPA comments. These topics provide insight into key behaviors that drive different level of resident autonomy and may allow for data-driven revision of EPA entrustment maps.

Indexed as

Formative FeedbackModels, EducationalClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationData ScienceFaculty, MedicalFeasibility StudiesHumansInternship and ResidencyMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingProfessional AutonomySpecialties, SurgicalSurgeonsAssessmentEntrustable professional activitiesFeedbackNatural language processingSurgery education

Identifiers

PMID33256944
PMCPMC7969407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.