ReviewSeminars in hematology2020
Pharmacogenomics and ALL treatment: How to optimize therapy.
Review in Seminars in hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of knowledge, attitude and practice of pharmacogenomics in pediatric oncology patients.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence of TPMT and NUDT15 diplotypes in Mexican children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2026Article
- Effect of American genomic ancestry on severe toxicities in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Amazon region.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Improved HPLC Quantification of 6-Mercaptopurine Metabolites in Red Blood Cells: Monitoring Data and Literature Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Clinical Genomics, and Pharmacogenomics Approaches in Precision Medicine.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Inherited genetic variations may alter drug sensitivity in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, predisposing to adverse treatment side effects. In this review, we discuss evidence from children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia to review the available pharmacogenomic data with an emphasis on clinically actionable and emerging discoveries, for example, genetic variants in thiopurine methyltransferase and NUDT15 that alter 6-mercaptopurine dosing. We also highlight the need for ongoing pharmacogenomic research to validate the significance of recent findings. Further research in young adults, as well as with novel therapeutics, is needed to provide optimal therapy in future trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.