Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256762›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2020

Fully‑automated deep‑learning segmentation of pediatric cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with complex congenital heart diseases.

Saeed Karimi-Bidhendi, Arghavan Arafati, Andrew L Cheng, Yilei Wu, Arash Kheradvar, Hamid Jafarkhani

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Cancer Imaging.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reference values of right ventricular volumetric variables in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Automated biventricular quantification in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot using a three-dimensional deep learning segmentation model.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saeed Karimi-BidhendiCenter for Pervasive Communications and Computing, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA.
Arghavan ArafatiEdwards Lifesciences Center for Advanced Cardiovascular Technology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA.
Andrew L ChengThe Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Yilei WuCenter for Pervasive Communications and Computing, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA.
Arash KheradvarEdwards Lifesciences Center for Advanced Cardiovascular Technology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA. arashkh@uci.edu.
Hamid JafarkhaniCenter for Pervasive Communications and Computing, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA. hamidj@uci.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor the growing patient population with congenital heart disease (CHD), improving clinical workflow, accuracy of diagnosis, and efficiency of analyses are considered unmet clinical needs. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging offers non-invasive and non-ionizing assessment of CHD patients. However, although CMR data facilitates reliable analysis of cardiac function and anatomy, clinical workflow mostly relies on manual analysis of CMR images, which is time consuming. Thus, an automated and accurate segmentation platform exclusively dedicated to pediatric CMR images can significantly improve the clinical workflow, as the present work aims to establish.

methodsTraining artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for CMR analysis requires large annotated datasets, which are not readily available for pediatric subjects and particularly in CHD patients. To mitigate this issue, we devised a novel method that uses a generative adversarial network (GAN) to synthetically augment the training dataset via generating synthetic CMR images and their corresponding chamber segmentations. In addition, we trained and validated a deep fully convolutional network (FCN) on a dataset, consisting of [Formula: see text] pediatric subjects with complex CHD, which we made publicly available. Dice metric, Jaccard index and Hausdorff distance as well as clinically-relevant volumetric indices are reported to assess and compare our platform with other algorithms including U-Net and cvi42, which is used in clinics.

resultsFor congenital CMR dataset, our FCN model yields an average Dice metric of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for LV at end-diastole and end-systole, respectively, and [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for RV at end-diastole and end-systole, respectively. Using the same dataset, the cvi42, resulted in [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for LV and RV at end-diastole and end-systole, and the U-Net architecture resulted in [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for LV and RV at end-diastole and end-systole, respectively.

conclusionsThe chambers' segmentation results from our fully-automated method showed strong agreement with manual segmentation and no significant statistical difference was found by two independent statistical analyses. Whereas cvi42 and U-Net segmentation results failed to pass the t-test. Relying on these outcomes, it can be inferred that by taking advantage of GANs, our method is clinically relevant and can be used for pediatric and congenital CMR segmentation and analysis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAge FactorsAutomationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowCMR image analysisComplex CHD analysisDeep learningFully convolutional networksGenerative adversarial networksMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33256762
PMCPMC7706241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.