Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256705›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Preferred teaching styles of medical faculty: an international multi-center study.

Nihar Ranjan Dash, Salman Yousuf Guraya, Mohammad Tahseen Al Bataineh, Mohamed Elhassan Abdalla, Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff, Mona Faisal Al-Qahtani, Walther N K A van Mook, Muhammad Saeed Shafi, Hamdi Hameed Almaramhy, Wail Nuri Osman Mukhtar

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nihar Ranjan DashClinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Post Box -, 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Salman Yousuf GurayaClinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Post Box -, 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. salmanguraya@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-023X
Mohammad Tahseen Al BatainehClinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Post Box -, 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Mohamed Elhassan AbdallaClinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Post Box -, 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Muhamad Saiful Bahri YusoffDepartment of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Mona Faisal Al-QahtaniCollege of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Walther N K A van MookSchool of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Muhammad Saeed ShafiShifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hamdi Hameed AlmaramhyCollege of Medicine, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Wail Nuri Osman MukhtarFaculty of Medicine, University of Gezira, Gezira, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the current wave of educational reforms, understanding teaching styles of medical faculty can help modify instructional strategies for effective teaching. Few studies have probed distinctive teaching styles of medical faculty. We compared preferred teaching styles of faculty from seven medical schools in United Arab Emirates, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Sudan.

methodsThe validated Grasha-Riechmann teaching style inventory was administered online for data collection and used SPSS version 20.0 for statistical analysis.

resultsOf the 460 invitees, 248 responded (response rate; 54%). Delegator teaching style was most common with a highest median and mean of 2.38 and 2.45, respectively. There was a significant correlation between expert and authority teaching styles, correlation coefficient 0.62. Similarly, we found a significant correlation between authority teaching style and nature of curriculum, correlation coefficient 0.30. Multiple regression analysis showed that only authority teaching style and male gender had significant correlation. Interestingly, 117 (47%) teachers disagreed with the teaching philosophy of delivering course contents by strictly following learning outcomes. Female teachers (114/248) were more willing to negotiate with their students regarding how and what to teach in their course, while male teachers tended to allow more autonomy by allowing students to set their learning agenda.

conclusionsThis study showed that the medical teachers preferred delegator teacher style that promotes students' collaboration and peer-to-peer learning. Most teachers are conscious of their teaching styles to motivate students for scientific curiosity. These findings can help medical educators to modify their teaching styles for effective learning.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalTeachingFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleNetherlandsPakistanSaudi ArabiaSudanSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Arab EmiratesInstructional strategies.Medical curriculumProblem based learningStudents learning styleTeaching style

Identifiers

PMID33256705
PMCPMC7708200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.