Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256677›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Once is rarely enough: can social prescribing facilitate adherence to non-clinical community and voluntary sector health services? Empirical evidence from Germany.

Veronika Golubinski, Eva-Maria Wild, Vera Winter, Jonas Schreyögg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current Trends and Future Directions in Urban Social Prescribing.Current environmental health reports · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Global Trends in Social Prescribing: Web-Based Crawling Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronika GolubinskiDepartment of Health Care Management, Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), University of Hamburg, Esplanade 36, 20354, Hamburg, Germany.
Eva-Maria WildDepartment of Health Care Management, Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), University of Hamburg, Esplanade 36, 20354, Hamburg, Germany. eva.wild@uni-hamburg.de.
Vera WinterDepartment of Health Care Management, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Jonas SchreyöggDepartment of Health Care Management, Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), University of Hamburg, Esplanade 36, 20354, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Joint Committee NVF2_2016-042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-clinical health interventions provided by the voluntary and community sector can improve patients' health and well-being and reduce pressure on primary and secondary care, but only if patients adhere to them. This study provides novel insights into the impact of doctor referrals to such services, known as social prescribing, on patients' adherence to them.

methodsUsing a negative binomial model, we analysed electronic visitor records from a community health advice and navigation service in Germany between January 2018 and December 2019 to determine whether social prescribing was associated with greater adherence to the service (measured in terms of return visits) compared to patients who self-referred. We also explored whether this effect differed according to patient characteristics.

resultsBased on 1734 observations, we found that social prescribing was significantly associated with a greater number of return visits compared to patient self-referrals (p < 0.05). For patients who visited the service because of psychological concerns, the effect of social prescribing was lower. For all other patient characteristics, the effect remained unchanged, suggesting relevance to all other patient groups.

conclusionsThe results of our study indicate that social prescribing may be an effective way to facilitate adherence to non-clinical community and voluntary sector health services. This knowledge is important for policy makers who are deciding whether to implement or expand upon social prescribing schemes.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationSocial ParticipationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity Health ServicesEmpirical ResearchFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceVoluntary Health AgenciesYoung AdultCommunity and voluntary sectorDeprivationGermanyNon-clinical health servicesPatient engagementSocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID33256677
PMCPMC7706247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.