Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256660›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Impact of a community-based pilot intervention to tackle childhood obesity: a 'whole-system approach' case study.

E W Gadsby, S Hotham, T Eida, C Lawrence, R Merritt

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E W GadsbyCentre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK. E.Gadsby@kent.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-5911
S HothamCentre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK.
T EidaCentre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK.
C LawrenceCity of Westminster Council, Public Health Directorate, 64 Victoria Street, London, UK.
R MerrittCentre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK.
University of Kent · GBWestminster City Council · GB

Funding

Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea Council N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGo-Golborne was a three-year pilot programme to test an innovative, community-based 'whole system' approach to preventing overweight in children in Golborne ward, London. Whilst there is a growing interest in local whole systems approaches to obesity, understandings of what they look like in practice are newly emerging. Go-Golborne was designed, implemented and evaluated within this context.

methodsThe evaluation used a case-study design and theory of change approach to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. Height/weight measurements of children in the six participating primary schools were recorded annually for 4 years. For behavioural outcomes, children aged six-11 completed four annual on-line surveys (total 4331 responses). Parents were surveyed in year one and year four (177 responses). Three focus group discussions were held with children aged 10-11 (N = 21); interviews were conducted with parents (N = 11), and school representatives (N = 4). Stakeholders were surveyed twice (37 responses), and interviews were conducted with key stakeholders (N = 11). An extensive range of programme documents were reviewed and additional process data was collected from the programme team. The RE-AIM framework was used to synthesise findings and examine public health impact.

resultsGo-Golborne reached a diverse range of partners across Golborne. Events were attended by over 3360 local children and families and all six primary schools in the ward actively engaged in activities. The proportion of children in the above healthy weight categories remained stable over time. A number of changes in home, school and neighbourhood environments to support healthy behaviour change were evidenced. There was some qualitative evidence of positive changes in children's behaviours, though significant or sustained changes were not evidenced by the quantitative data.

conclusionsGo-Golborne helped stakeholders and parents to develop a shared commitment to improving healthy weight in children, to identify barriers to a healthy lifestyle, and to start to make changes in their services/behaviours. The campaigns and changes made at micro-level appeared to be insufficient, in the face of counteracting forces and personal factors, to achieve significant behaviour change within 3 years. This highlights the need for local initiatives to be reinforced by supporting action at regional, national and global levels.

Indexed as

ChildCommunity Health ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLondonMaleOrganizational Case StudiesParentsPediatric ObesityPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildhood obesityCommunity-basedEvaluationHealth improvementPreventionRE-AIMWhole systems

Identifiers

PMID33256660
PMCPMC7708136
OpenAlexW3108775646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.