Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256659›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2020

The safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation as add-on therapy to fluoxetine in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, clinical trial.

Sadegh Yoosefee, Man Amanat, Mona Salehi, Seyed Vahid Mousavi, Jamshid Behzadmanesh, Victoria Safary, Ali Yoonesi, Bahman Salehi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sadegh YoosefeeNeurosciences Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Man AmanatFaculty of Medicine, Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mona SalehiFaculty of Medicine, Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Vahid MousaviNeuroImmunology Research Association (NIRA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
Jamshid BehzadmaneshDepartment of Psychiatry, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Victoria SafaryDepartment of Psychiatry, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Ali YoonesiDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bahman SalehiDepartment of Psychiatry, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. Basalehi@yahoo.com.
Arak University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRQom University of Medical Science and Health Services · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IR

Funding

Arak University of Medical Sciences 1143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is an anxiety disorder that causes impairment in daily activities. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as adjunctive therapy with fluoxetine in individuals diagnosed with moderate to severe OCD.

methodsThis is a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial. Individuals with OCD who had baseline Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) of > 15 were enrolled. Eligible cases were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either 20-min-period of stimulation with tDCS and fluoxetine (experimental arm) or fluoxetine only (sham control arm). The anodal electrode of tDCS was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Fp3) and the cathodal electrode was placed over the right orbitofrontal cortex (F8). Two mA electrical stimulation with the tDCS was used for 20 min in individuals of experimental group. In the control group, electrodes were placed and stimulation was administered for 30 s to induce the same skin sensation as in experimental group. This procedure was performed three times per week for 8 weeks. Y-BOCS test was assessed at baseline, week 4 (after 12th stimulation), week 8 (after 24th stimulation), and 1 month after the last stimulation. The primary endpoints were the mean changes in Y-BOCS total score from baseline to the last visit. The secondary endpoints were the mean changes in obsession and compulsion sub-scores from baseline to the last visit. Adverse events were also assessed. Mixed design repeated measures analysis of variance assessed the endpoints.

resultsSixty individuals (30 in each group) were participated. All individuals in control group and 28 cases in experimental arm completed the trial. The mean Y-BOCS (F

conclusionThis study showed that among individuals with moderate to severe OCD, there was no significant difference regarding OC symptoms between cases used tDCS as adjunctive therapy with fluoxetine and individuals used fluoxetine only.

trial registrationIRCT2017030632904N1 . Registered 14 July 2017, http://irct.ir/user/trial/44193/view.

Indexed as

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderTranscranial Direct Current StimulationDouble-Blind MethodFluoxetineHumansTreatment OutcomeFluoxetineAnxietyFluoxetineObsessive-compulsive disorderTranscranial direct current stimulationYale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale

Identifiers

PMID33256659
PMCPMC7708220
OpenAlexW3109209834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.