Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256635›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2020

Net ultrafiltration prescription survey in Europe.

Nuttha Lumlertgul, Raghavan Murugan, Nina Seylanova, Patricia McCready, Marlies Ostermann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05306964 (REstrictive Versus LIberal Rate of Extracorporeal Volume Removal Evaluation in Acute Kidney Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05306964 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

REstrictive Versus LIberal Rate of Extracorporeal Volume Removal Evaluation in Acute Kidney Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2022 to 2024Enrolled99ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury, Fluid Overload, Hypotension, DialysisArmsRestrictive UFnet Rate Strategy, Liberal UFnet Rate Strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Nuttha LumlertgulDepartment of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Raghavan MuruganThe Center for Critical Care Nephrology, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nina SeylanovaDepartment of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Patricia McCreadyDepartment of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Marlies OstermannDepartment of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK. marlies.ostermann@gstt.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9500-9080
St Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid overload is common in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and ultrafiltration (UF) is frequently required. There is lack of guidance on optimal UF practice. We aimed to explore patterns of UF practice, barriers to achieving UF targets, and concerns related to UF practice among practitioners working in Europe.

methodsThis was a sub-study of an international open survey with focus on adult intensivists and nephrologists, advanced practice providers, and ICU and dialysis nurses working in Europe.

resultsFour hundred eighty-five practitioners (75% intensivists) from 31 countries completed the survey. The most common criteria for UF initiation was persistent oliguria/anuria (45.6%), followed by pulmonary edema (16.7%). Continuous renal replacement therapy was the preferred initial modality (90.0%). The median initial and maximal rate of net ultrafiltration (UF

conclusionsThere was a significant variation in UF practice and perception among practitioners in Europe. Future research should focus on identifying the best strategies of prescribing and managing ultrafiltration in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Continuous Renal Replacement TherapyCritical CareCritical Care NursingDiureticsEuropeHumansIntermittent Renal Replacement TherapyNephrologistsNurse PractitionersNursesPulmonary EdemaSurveys and QuestionnairesWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceDiureticsFluid overloadFluid removalRenal replacement therapyUltrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID33256635
PMCPMC7706211
OpenAlexW3108195048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.