ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
The Combined Detection of Immune Genes for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and Functional Analysis of Individual-Specific Subpathways in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Genes · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of an Immune-Based Prognostic Risk Score for Patients With Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Identification of Hypoxia Signature to Assess the Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Predict Prognosis in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.International journal of endocrinology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the fields of tumor and immunity. This study focused on the possible prognostic value of immune genes in non-small cell lung cancer patients. We used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to download gene expression data and clinical information of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). The immune gene list was downloaded from the Immport database. We then constructed immune gene prognostic models on the basis of Cox regression analysis. We further evaluated the clinical significance of the models via survival analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and independent prognostic factor analysis. Moreover, we analyzed the associations of prognostic models with both mutation burdens and neoantigens. Using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Kaplan-Meier plotter databases, we evaluated the validity of the prognostic models. The prognostic model of LUAD included 13 immune genes, and the prognostic model of LUSC contained 10 immune genes. High-risk patients based on prognostic models had a lower 5-year survival rate than did low-risk patients. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated the prediction accuracy of the prognostic models, as the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.742, 0.707, and 0.711 for LUAD, and 0.668, 0.703, and 0.668 for LUSC, when the predicted survival times were 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The mutation burden analysis showed that mutation level was associated with the risk score in patients with LUAD. The analysis based on GEO and Kaplan-Meier plotter demonstrated the prognostic validity of the models. Therefore, immune gene-related models of LUAD and LUSC can predict prognosis. Further study of these genes may enable us to better distinguish between LUAD and LUSC and lead to improvement in immunotherapy for lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.