Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256467›Full record

ArticleAssessment2022

Validation of a Brief Measure of Aggression for Ecological Momentary Assessment Research: The Aggression-ES-A.

Aja Louise Murray, Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud, Tom Booth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Substance-involved child-to-parent violence.Drug and alcohol review · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Ecological momentary assessment of mood regulation eating expectancies in eating disorders: Convergent and predictive validity.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of Pressing Issues in Ecological Momentary Assessment.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aja Louise MurrayUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9068-3188
Manuel EisnerUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Denis RibeaudUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tom BoothUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) holds significant potential within aggression research. It affords researchers the possibility of collecting data in ecological context, in near real time. However, there is a lack of measures of aggression that have been developed and validated for use in EMA contexts. In this study, we report on the validation of a measure specifically designed to address this need: the Aggression-ES-A. Building on a previous pilot study, we evaluate the within- and between-person reliability, nomological net and associations with a validated trait measure of aggression of the Aggression-ES-A in a sample of

Indexed as

AggressionEcological Momentary AssessmentAdolescentAdultChildHumansPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultaggressionecological momentary assessmentexperience samplingmultilevel confirmatory factor analysispsychometric

Identifiers

PMID33256467
PMCPMC8796149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.