ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020
Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Risk Factors, Their Interaction Patterns, and Scoring Systems for Liver Cancer Between Patients With and Those Without Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Electronic Health Records and Tree-Structured Algorithms.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Innovative Strategies in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Cirrhosis and Associated Syndromes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pathogenic nsSNPs of protein kinase C-eta with hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
- Scoring System for Predicting the Risk of Liver Cancer among Diabetes Patients: A Random Survival Forest-Guided Approach.Cancers · 2024Article
- Update on the applications and limitations of alpha-fetoprotein for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Liver cancer risk-predictive molecular biomarkers specific to clinico-epidemiological contexts.Advances in cancer research · 2022Article
- Virus-Induced Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Progress and Future Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Absent in melanoma 1-like (AIM1L) serves as a novel candidate for overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Prediction of the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma in health screening examinees: a Korean cohort study.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Profibrotic Signaling and HCC Risk during Chronic Viral Hepatitis: Biomarker Development.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk becomes increasingly important with recently emerging HCC-predisposing conditions, namely non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cured hepatitis C virus infection. These etiologies are accompanied with a relatively low HCC incidence rate (~1% per year or less), while affecting a large patient population. Hepatitis B virus infection remains a major HCC risk factor, but a majority of the patients are now on antiviral therapy, which substantially lowers, but does not eliminate, HCC risk. Thus, it is critically important to identify a small subset of patients who have elevated likelihood of developing HCC, to optimize the allocation of limited HCC screening resources to those who need it most and enable cost-effective early HCC diagnosis to prolong patient survival. To date, numerous clinical-variable-based HCC risk scores have been developed for specific clinical contexts defined by liver disease etiology, severity, and other factors. In parallel, various molecular features have been reported as potential HCC risk biomarkers, utilizing both tissue and body-fluid specimens. Deep-learning-based risk modeling is an emerging strategy. Although none of them has been widely incorporated in clinical care of liver disease patients yet, some have been undergoing the process of validation and clinical development. In this review, these risk scores and biomarker candidates are overviewed, and strategic issues in their validation and clinical translation are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.