Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256160›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Shifting the Paradigm: The Dress-COV Telegram Bot as a Tool for Participatory Medicine.

Michela Franchini, Stefania Pieroni, Nicola Martini, Andrea Ripoli, Dante Chiappino, Francesca Denoth, Michael Norman Liebman, Sabrina Molinaro, Daniele Della Latta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pathophysiologic Basis of Connected Health Systems.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michela FranchiniData Learn Lab, Institute of Clinical Physiology of the National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-341X
Stefania PieroniData Learn Lab, Institute of Clinical Physiology of the National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8130-4967
Nicola MartiniData Learn Lab, Gabriele Monasterio Foundation, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-0163
Andrea RipoliData Learn Lab, Gabriele Monasterio Foundation, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Dante ChiappinoData Learn Lab, Gabriele Monasterio Foundation, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Francesca DenothData Learn Lab, Institute of Clinical Physiology of the National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7825-1753
Michael Norman LiebmanIPQ Analytics, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8626-8432
Sabrina MolinaroData Learn Lab, Institute of Clinical Physiology of the National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-0873
Daniele Della LattaData Learn Lab, Gabriele Monasterio Foundation, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0628-2312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic management is limited by great uncertainty, for both health systems and citizens. Facing this information gap requires a paradigm shift from traditional approaches to healthcare to the participatory model of improving health. This work describes the design and function of the Doing Risk sElf-assessment and Social health Support for COVID (Dress-COV) system. It aims to establish a lasting link between the user and the tool; thus, enabling modeling of the data to assess individual risk of infection, or developing complications, to improve the individual's self-empowerment. The system uses bot technology of the Telegram application. The risk assessment includes the collection of user responses and the modeling of data by machine learning models, with increasing appropriateness based on the number of users who join the system. The main results reflect: (a) the individual's compliance with the tool; (b) the security and versatility of the architecture; (c) support and promotion of self-management of behavior to accommodate surveillance system delays; (d) the potential to support territorial health providers, e.g., the daily efforts of general practitioners (during this pandemic, as well as in their routine practices). These results are unique to Dress-COV and distinguish our system from classical surveillance applications.

Indexed as

COVID-19Epidemiological MonitoringPandemicsSoftwareAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth PromotionHumansItalyMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurveys and Questionnairesco-morbidity profileCOVID-19participatory medicineSARS-CoV-2telegram bot

Identifiers

PMID33256160
PMCPMC7729623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.