Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256130›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes-A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR.

László Sipos, Rita Végh, Zsanett Bodor, John-Lewis Zinia Zaukuu, Géza Hitka, György Bázár, Zoltan Kovacs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

László SiposCommercial and Sensory Science, Department of Postharvest, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, 39-43 Villányi Street, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4584-6697
Rita VéghDepartment of Food Chemistry and Nutrition Science, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, 14-16 Somlói Street, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
Zsanett BodorDepartment of Measurement and Process Control, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, 14-16 Somlói Street, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
John-Lewis Zinia ZaukuuDepartment of Measurement and Process Control, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, 14-16 Somlói Street, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2058-4416
Géza HitkaCommercial and Sensory Science, Department of Postharvest, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, 39-43 Villányi Street, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
György BázárDepartment of Nutritional Science and Production Technology, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Szent István University, 40 Guba Sándor Street, 7400 Kaposvár, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9829-4366
Zoltan KovacsDepartment of Measurement and Process Control, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, 14-16 Somlói Street, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

European Social Fund EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00005Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Bolyai János Research ScholarshipMinistry for Innovation and Technology NKFIH-1159-6/2019Ministry for Innovation and Technology ÚNKP-20-3-II-SZIE-12Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal 135700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemical composition of bee pollens differs greatly and depends primarily on the botanical origin of the product. Therefore, it is a crucially important task to discriminate pollens of different plant species. In our work, we aim to determine the applicability of microscopic pollen analysis, spectral colour measurement, sensory, NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue methods for the classification of bee pollen of five different botanical origins. Chemometric methods (PCA, LDA) were used to classify bee pollen loads by analysing the statistical pattern of the samples and to determine the independent and combined effects of the above-mentioned methods. The results of the microscopic analysis identified 100% of sunflower, red clover, rapeseed and two polyfloral pollens mainly containing lakeshore bulrush and spiny plumeless thistle. The colour profiles of the samples were different for the five different samples. E-nose and NIR provided 100% classification accuracy, while e-tongue > 94% classification accuracy for the botanical origin identification using LDA. Partial least square regression (PLS) results built to regress on the sensory and spectral colour attributes using the fused data of NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue showed higher than 0.8 R

Indexed as

Electronic NosePollenAnimalsBeesColorimetryDiscriminant AnalysisTongueCIE L*a*b* colour coordinateselectronic noseelectronic tonguelinear discriminant analysis (LDA)multivariate analysispalynological analysispartial least square regression (PLSR)principal component analysis (PCA)sensory panel performancespectra

Identifiers

PMID33256130
PMCPMC7730699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.